1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
horrorfan [7]
3 years ago
10

5. This army of displaced persons wandered Europe

History
1 answer:
Sergio [31]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Refugees

Explanation:

As millions of refugees without any home or place to go wanders all over Europe

You might be interested in
What was NOT a government reform that the progressives advocated? A) Consumer protection B) Patronage C) Workers compensation D)
STatiana [176]

Answer:patronage

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Completed in 1805, the Dismal Swamp Canal greatly improved transportation in northeastern North Carolina. The canal connected Al
WINSTONCH [101]

The correct answer is the Chesapeake Bay,

The Dismal Swamp Canal started being built in 1793 and it was completed by 1805.It was mostly constructed by slaves. The responsibles behind its constructions were The Dismal Swamp Company, the state of North Carolina and Virginia.

Its main use was the carriage of lumber from the Dismal Swamp by the time the canal was completed.

The canal connected the two states mentioned before and established a connection between the Elizabeth and Pasquotank River. Therefore, it connected the Albemarle Sound with the Chesapeake Bay.



5 0
3 years ago
who were the primary leaders in the southern colonies? anne hutchinson and william penn james oglethorpe and anne hutchinson geo
Natasha2012 [34]
Calvert, Oglethorpe, and Smith
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How were Simon bolivar and Jose de San Martin similar
Butoxors [25]

José de San Martín vs. Simón Bolívar

José de San Martín, 1778-1850, and Simon Bolívar, 1783-1830, were two of the primary causes of independence of countries from colonial powers in Latin America. Simon Bolívar is primarily known for liberating Venezuela, and he is called the Liberator of the North. José de San Martín, known as the Liberator of the South, is primarily known for freeing Argentina. Both men are well-known and lived during about the same time period and even met each other. However, their areas of liberation, methods of liberation and motives were very different from each other.

Bolívar and Martín differed in areas of jurisdiction – Venezuela and Argentina, respectively, as well as methods and means of revolution. Bolívar was 26 years old when Venezuela declared its independence in 1811, and under the revolutionary leader he brought back Francisco de Miranda, who had long advocated freedom from the Spanish rule Venezuela was once under, to become Venezuela’s leader. However, after an erratic and unsuccessful leadership, Bolívar captured Miranda (after his rebel army was stopped) and betrayed him by turning over to the Spanish, but the Spanish only sent Bolívar into exile (unlike Miranda, who they imprisoned). After returning from exile, Bolívar taught creoles that they could rebel successfully against 3 decades of Spanish rule, but was then drove out by the Spaniards. After being chased out of Venezuela three more times, while using terror tactics the Spanish had once used against Creoles such as suffocation, while gaining the support of the British and a bond with Haiti, and while declaring that he would abolish slavery as his first official act (if in power), he decided to build a guerilla warfare army in 1817. After defeating the Spanish in New Granada (which consisted of present-day Columbia, Ecuador, Venezuela, and Panama) using guerilla tactics and the help of thousands of mercenaries from Britain and Germany, he met with San Martín and desired to take advantage of Spain’s falling empire (due to political disagreements and an army revolt), but did not collaborate with him on a major scale. Bolívar formed a series of nations called “Grand Columbia” out of New Granada from which he intended to make a “model of strength and aggression from outside and of cooperation inside”, however, this unification soon disbanded itself (Adams, 33). Bolívar’s last battle ended in splendor in 1823, as it was entirely between cavalry with swords and lances.

5 0
3 years ago
Some people criticized the growing materialism of American culture. true or false
Musya8 [376]

Its true because who doesn't shine criticism on america.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Much of modern Indian culture can be traced to which early Indian culture?<br> erian
    5·1 answer
  • Following Jay’s Treaty, George Washington’s approval rating, to borrow a modern phrase, plummeted and there was even talk in the
    5·2 answers
  • What was a result of Simón Bolívar's military leadership?
    13·2 answers
  • What are the arguments against mandatory minimum sentencing laws? Name two
    9·1 answer
  • What is loyalty to one's country called? <br>A.Communism <br>B.Facism<br>C.Nationalism
    14·1 answer
  • How does Gyeong-hee’s perspective develop over the course of the story?
    13·1 answer
  • PLEASE
    15·1 answer
  • Why did the Revolution radicalize? (3 major causes) (french revolution)
    9·1 answer
  • HHHUUURRRRYYY!!!PPLLLSSSYY20points
    15·2 answers
  • How are party candidates chosen ?
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!