Answer:
Arguing from analogy
Explanation:
Argument by analogy is a term used to describe a situation where a non-deductive assessment is made comparing two things that are totally similar, or in some ways, that is, this type of argument allows conclusions to be made by comparing two similar things . these conclusions are capable of helping an individual to make some important decisions.
An example of this can be seen in the question above, where in an argument related to the pricing of goods, Nathan, sales manager at Expa Manufacturing Inc., argues that the company will charge 25% more than the previous price because Leon Manufacturing , Expo Manufacturing's sister company, charges more for its goods. These two companies are similar and a decision is being made about them, based on the comparison between the two.
Answer:
Abnormal grief that may require psychological counseling is the correct answer.
Explanation:
Answer:
Supremacy Clause of Article VI of the Constitution
Explanation:
Supreme Court ruled based on the constitutional principal of Supremacy Clause of Article VI of the Constitution regarding the relationship between the state and federal governments.
Here, the court, ruled that, Maryland has no power to tax the Bank because, considering Supremacy Clause of Article VI of the Constitution, the laws of the United States is superior in the case of conflicting state laws. In the Chief Justice word: "the government of the Union, though limited in its powers, is supreme within its sphere of action, and its laws, when made in pursuance of the constitution, form the supreme law of the land." Because "the power to tax is the power to destroy,".
Other constitutional principle in which the verdict was based in relation to state and federal government is the issue of " constitutional sovereignty" in which United States has constitutional sovereignty there by Maryland's tax, violated constitutional sovereignty because it acted as a levy against all the people in the United States by a state accountable to only some of the people.
Another constitutional principle in which the court rule is Necessary and Proper Clause of Article I, Section 8, which expressly grants Congress the power to pass laws such as the power to regulate interstate commerce, collect taxes, and borrow money.
2) Either regulatory or antitrust. I haven't taken econ (except for Academic Decathlon Econ), so I might be wrong on this one.
3) <span>Blake Mycoskie
</span>4) Joseph Unahue because all the others invented their own products.
5) Demand for avocados would increase, causing prices to decrease. Look at the supply vs demand curve. They're inverse of one another. Basic econ
6) <span>the cost of luxury items like jewelry increases. if it's a luxury item, the supply will never increase; it will remain the same. but if there is less demand for it, then the cost will go up so that shop owners can pay off their bills.
7 and 8 aren't showing up for me so I think you typed too much in the problem.
Hope that helps. </span>
The answer is: Fork
The pilgrims at their thanksgiving dinner on the native's land. By the time of the thanksgiving dinner, forks were already invented and widely used by Europeans. But the natives were not familiar with forks as a utensil. The only utensils that available among the natives were only knife and spoon.
