Answer: quid pro quo sexual harassment
Explanation:
The scenario represented in the question regarding Rhonda and her company's chief financial officer is referred to as quid pro quo sexual harassment.
Quid pro quo sexual harassment is a situation that occurs when benefits, pay, employment, position, training, title, position are based on the condition that the other individual involved agree to ones sexual advances. It should be noted that this is illegal.
Answer:
Because this transaction MEET the control of the corporation requirement, Janice has income of $0 and Thom has income of $
Explanation:
Based on the information we were told that Thom provide service that is worth $40,000 which means that the amount of $40,000 is Thom income but we were not told that Janice has an income, which means that Janice will have an income of $0.
Hence, Because this transaction MEET the control of the corporation requirement, Janice has income of $0 and Thom has income of $
40,000.
The general rule you are refering is that it should not exceed greatly the credit term period. Rules that do not apply in this case is the 30 days exceed rule, the rule that says that it can be any length as l<span>ong as the customer cont<span>inues to buy merchandise, and the rule that says that it should not greatly exceed the discount period. </span></span>
The correct answer to this question is this one: "B.. leasing a car for a certain period." Rob changes his car every year and prefers a car that is always under warranty. The option that will suit him best is that of B.. leasing a car for a certain period. Hope this helps answer your question