This is one of those questions that is near impossible to answer.
The best I can give you, based upon my reading, is that it is likely that slavery would have continued for quite a while longer. Over time, though, it would have held a diminished role in society as the South industrialized. The advent of the assembly line would have further pushed the decline.
Holding slaves was a morally bankrupt AND expensive endeavor. For a long time, the cost benefit analysis for slave owners was that they could get years of work out of a person without wages. Eventually, with technology, this would have made the institution less of a good "investment," combined with moral pressure as most of the Western world divested itself from slavery.
So, you'd likely see a more pronounced version of our de facto slavery with migrant farm workers in the United States.
Answer:I believe the correct answer from the choices listed above is the third option. The way a society makes and spends money is its aggregate economic behavior. It refers to economy-wide sums of individual behavior. Hope this answers the question. Have a nice day.
Explanation:
Answer:
Causes: Emergence of capitalism, European imperialism, coal mining efforts, the rise in population, and the effects of the Agricultural Revolution.
Consequences (consequences does not mean negative effects) : Increased wealth, production of goods were more efficient (mass production), better standard of living, healthier foods, better housing, and education took a rise as well.
Explanation:
I took APWH and I am taking APUSH. I know this, trust me.
Answer:
Christian unity ended in western Europe. Who broke from the Roman Catholic Church so he could remarry and became the head of a new Protestant church in his country
Explanation:
Upon Lenin's death, Stalin was officially hailed as his successor as the leader of the ruling Communist Party and of the Soviet Union itself.
