You need a constintuanal convention
Depends on the leader and the country and what happening eg war. For example if one leader wished a war on lets say japan while another wants to focus on industry. Delegates will like a more freindly leader
A. He could not influence the other other Allied leader to accept his Fourteen Points
Both presidentialism and parliamentarism are unequivocally democratic, but each of these regimes leads to different political consequences.
The great difference is that in parliamentarism the executive branch is composed of a president or a monarch, head of state, with limited powers, and a government appointed by Parliament, which at any time can censor. In presidentialism, however, the head of state and government coincide in the same person, are not subject to parliamentary censure and the Legislative Branch is limited to the area of law making.
Therefore, in presidentialism, voters elect the head of government (who in turn is head of state); instead, in parliamentarism, the head of government is appointed by the head of state, who is voted by the people.
it was used to defend slavery when the slave owners would say it was their god given right to own slaves but used to oppose it when people would say that it was against God's will