To enforce and implement laws made by the Congress.
It is like Nixon said, "no event in American history is more misunderstood than the Vietnam War." I can't give a clear answer but I do have some food for thought which may paint a big picture.
1. You have to keep in mind that Vietnam was not about who killed more troops.
If the winner of the Vietnam war was declared by who killed more troops than the U.S. would win hands down. The U.S. casualties were roughly half a million, where as the Vietcong suffered a little more than a million. Then how did we lose?
2. Keep in mind that at this time technology has improved and Vietnam is the first war where people are watching it go on right at home on there television screen.
They are seeing their sons being shot and viewing dead soldiers every single day.
You did not see this in WW1 or WW2 or the Korena War.
Answer:
They became more concerned with foreign policy.
Explanation:
The tenth commemoration of the 9/11 assaults has turned into an event for reconsidering the fear mongering danger to the United States. Three key inquiries have been raised. What is the status and current quality of al-Qa'ida, the gathering that executed 9/11? Have measures taken since 9/11 made Americans any more secure today? Why has the United States not been assaulted once more—in any event in the feeling of being assaulted on a scale moving toward 9/11? These are beneficial inquiries, despite the fact that they each include a confined point of view toward psychological oppression and counterterrorism. The first is naturally constrained by being centered around just a solitary assortment of fear mongering or even only a solitary gathering. The second more often than not precludes reference to any standard of progress and disappointment in verifying Americans from psychological oppression or to the expenses and exchange offs involved in getting a given level of wellbeing. The third inquiry is normally longing for a clarification that would be too easy to even think about being a precise examination of what has decided the measure of psychological oppression coordinated against the United States during the previous decade.
The first developed societies showed up in Nubia before the time of the First dynasty of Egypt (3100-2890 B.C.E.). Around 2500 B.C.E., Egyptians began moving south, and it is through them that most of our knowledge of Kush (Cush) comes. This expansion was halted by the fall of the Middle Kingdom of Egypt. About 1500 B.C.E. Egyptian expansion resumed, but this time encountered organized resistance. Historians are not sure whether this resistance came from multiple city states or a single unified empire, and debate over whether the notion of statehood was indigenous or borrowed from the Egyptians. The Egyptians prevailed, and the region became a colony of Egypt under the control of Thutmose I, whose army ruled from a number of sturdy fortresses. The region supplied Egypt with resources, especially gold. Although ruled by foreigners from about 1500 until about 780 B.C.E. the people of Kush prospered, enjoying internal and external peace. They greatly benefited from their physical location on important trade routes and appear to have taken full advantage of this by developing a commercial
