The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options for this question we can say the following.
How did the League of Nations respond to genocide prior to 1945?
The League of Nations responded to genocide prior to 1945 in a weak way. The League of Nations failed to politically and militarily challenge this terrible act.
The League of Nations was a forum to resolve disputes among member countries. Through its charter, member nations pledged to act collectively against any country that attacked a member country. However, in reality, it did never had the proper organization and coordination to address important issues such as genocide.
The League of Nations was formed after World War 1 in order to prevent another armed conflict. It was the precursor of the United Nations. United States President Woodrow Wilson was one of the most important supporters of the idea although, in the end, the United States decided no to be part of the League.
Once the Portuguese breached [entered] the Indian Ocean, they didn't create, like, huge colonies, because there were already powerful empires in the region... ... [6:03] So, Portuguese merchant ships would capture other ships and force them to purchase a permit to trade called a cartaz.
The wealthy knew that the colonies could provide natural resources which could be sent back to England to be sold for profit. They could also sell goods from England in the colonies to also make profits.
Answer:
Specifically for law enforcement, social contract theory is important to justify the power that law enforcement can exert over the population as a whole . The power imbalance, held by law enforcement, is part of the contract that society has agreed upon in exchange for security.
Explanation:
