Working for the election of sympathetic public officials
Answer:
Fought and failed against Alexander's might?
Explanation:
What is your question?
<em>Answer: </em><em>These were the effects of World War I on Germany:</em>
<em />
<em>Many civilians were starving due to naval blockades. (From 1914 to 1919, Germany suffered a naval blockade in the hands of the Allies)</em>
<em>The nation was held responsible for the war and had to pay for other countries' losses. (The Treaty of Versailles stated everything that Germany was blamed for and how they were to repay for the damages)</em>
<em>The nation’s leader went into exile. (Wilhelm II fled to the Netherlands)</em>
<em>These were the effects of World War I on the United States:</em>
<em />
<em>The nation celebrated Armistice Day with the other allies who had won the war.</em>
<em>The nation teamed with others to create the Treaty of Versailles.</em>
<em>Explanation:</em>
<em />
<span>Certainly not. The United States has never, since its founding, consisted of a small number of citizens, still less of citizens that could practically assemble in one place at one time and debate their actions. A pure democracy in this classical Greek city-state sense was never practical, and was not seriously considered.
What the Framers created was a constitutional representative republic. Sovereignty is vested in the people, like a democracy (and unlike a constitutional monarchy), but the people do not rule directly. Instead, they elect representatives, at regular intervals, and these rule in the peoples' stead. Their powers are limited, first, by the fact that they are elected for only short terms, and must be re-elected if they wish to continue in power, and secondly, and much more importantly, by the Constitution itself, which puts express written limits on their powers even between elections.</span>
As displayed on a production possibilities curve, an increase in technology allow a society to produce more, as long as the resources are<span>also available</span>
