A Muslim religion Islamic
Hope this helps
Part 1
1. The mother's comment wouldn't affect Dimitri because he is still in the pre-operational stage of Cognitive development.
During this stage, the child would most likely haven't develop the cognitive ability that allow him to see a certain scenario for other people's point of view (he wouldn't understand how his friends feel because of his action)
2. In this scenario, even though Dimitri still hasn't reach the stage where he could feel empathy toward other children, he's already capable to connect a certain event with his own emotional response.
So, in order to encourage him to stop the behavior, i would take away his toys while he's playing it. By doing this, Dimitri would understand the effect of his behavior and might stop doing it to other children.
Part 2.
1 <span>Kohlberg might stated that Ryan is moving from a conventional (rule-following) stage of moral reasoning to a post conventional stage.
Post-conventional stage would be the stage where an individual started to develop their own personal moral standard rather than simply conforming to others
.Erickson would point out that Ryan is making personal effort to find his identity and the method that he choose to do this is by trying out different identities to see which one would fit him.</span>
Answer:
B. No fallacy
Explanation:
First of, we need to know what a fallacy is. A fallacy is a mistaken belief, especially one based on unsound arguments.
A sound argument is an argument in which the truth in the premises are used to deduce the conclusions. While an unsound argument, makes use of premises that are not true.
With these, we can determine if the argument in the question was a sound argument. If it was, it won't be fallacious.
There is truth in the fact that the slim tea made Barbara loose 15 pounds after taking it for the stated period of time.
Therefore, concluding that someone with the same buildup as Barbara will have the same results, after taking the tea for the same period of time, is logical and not fallacious. This is because the premise is a true fact that has been tested, and the conclusion was drawn from the true premise.
This makes the argument a sound argument, with no fallacy
If anti federalist were going to ratify the constitution then they wanted a bill of rights to be added.They wanted the bill of rights in there because it gives the rights given to the citizens not the government.
Hope this helps you!
