After reading the video transcript we can say Dr. X is convincing because he supports his explanation with facts, as stated in option B and explained below.
<h3>Why is Dr. X effective and convincing?</h3>
In the video "Dr. X and the Quest for Food Safety," Dr. X is effective at communicating the dangers of cross contamination. The reason for that is the fact that he supports his explanation with facts, that is, he provides evidence that proves his explanation right.
With the information above in mind, we can say Dr. X is convincing when he talks about how bacteria function and what can be done to prevent contamination. Option B is the correct answer.
The complete question with the answer choices can be found attached.
Learn more about food safety here:
brainly.com/question/934835
#SPJ1
It's quite difficult to answer your question without a poem attached. But as far as I remember, correct answer should look like this: In the poem, the phrase "sill of shade" refers to C. The loss of a life. The narrator of this poem is <span>A. The athletes father</span>.
In "The Return of a Private" when Edward Smith praises his wife's biscuits, he is really praising her.
Hamlin Garland writes about the tenderness between Edward and Emma Smith by depicting a deeper connection between the two characters. The clearest example of this comes when Edward praises Emma by praising her biscuits.
Answer:
We visit our grandfather's house in both the Summer and Winter
Explanation:
I'm not 100% sure about this one, But I gave it my best!
Which inference is the same as picking out the main idea from the supporting details?
A. Cause-effect
Hope this answers your question!
