Answer:
The biggest principle that the allies wanted to clean up after Napoleon was legitimacy.
Explanation:
Napoleon was a legitimate, recognized head of state, who everyone except England was allied with at one time or another. As a foreigner, they couldn’t execute the French head of state for acting on behalf of France. To just declare him a criminal and shoot him would have been admitting that the Czar of Russia and Emperor of Austria had been making deals with a criminal.
Also, some of the allies LIKED changes made by Napoleon and wanted to keep it. For example, Kings of the Confederation of the Rhine wanted to keep being Kings, not Grand Dukes or Electors. It was in their interest to not declare Napoleon an outright criminal.
Even the allies holding him on St. Helena wasn’t backed by law. How they were treating Napoleon had no legal precedence. They were making things up as they were going along. The reason why the British would never allow Napoleon to set foot on England was that Napoleon’s supporters would have filed a Habeas Corpus suit on behalf of Napoleon and make the British courts answer what law they were holding Napoleon under.
In the long run it actually played to the advantage of British that Napoleon was alive and under their control. Letting loose Napoleon was the ultimate political trump card they had against the Germans and the French.
U.S. had desperately tried to stay neutral, but ties to Britain, propaganda, the sinking of ships by German U-boats, and a German attempt in the Zimmermann Note to get Mexico to declare war on the U.S. pushed the U.S. to getting involved.
Possibly b the kkk was a group very racist toward people of color
Answer:
The Hausa states were exhausted economically because of internal and external constant wars. It was taken over by the Kanem-Bornu after the conquest of Usuman dan Fodio.
The location of Kanem-Bornu was at the center of African continent which is now part of Chad and Nigeria. The special geopolitical position attracted trades and the empire actually lied on the famous trans-Saharan trade route, that contributed to its power.
Explanation:
Question 1: How did Francis Lubbock's actions affect Texas' history over the next four years? Give details to support you answer.
Answer:
Francis Richard Lubbock was the governor of Texas from 1861 to 1863. Francis Lubbock's tried to expand the industrial resources to activate the economy and he sold U.S. bonds that were acquired in 1850, because of the depleted treasure vault.
<u>His actions affected Texas' history when he mobilized a frontier regiment of cavalry to combat a group of Indians</u>. The relationship with the tribes wasn't good at all. He saw the use of whites in government contracting and cattle driving as wasteful so he encouraged their replacement with slaves to increase enlistment. Aliens residing in Texas were also made subject to the draft. He exempted frontier counties from the Confederate draft and enlisted their residents to be in local defense against Indian attack. Lubbock considered liable for military Which of the main reasons for secession was most important in Texas' decision to secede? Justify your reasonservice men from 16 to 60 years old.
Question 2: Which of the main reasons for secession was most important in Texas' decision to secede? Justify your reason
Answer:
<u>Keeping people slaved was the primary goal of the state in joining the Confederacy</u>: Independence without slavery, would be valueless for the Texans. Texas also issued a declaration of causes where they laid out the reasons for declaring secession. Some of these reasons included its solidarity with its "sister slave-holding States," the U.S. government's inability to prevent Indian attacks, slave-stealing raids, and other border-crossing acts of banditry.
