For this question the answer will be D.
Option A. If a historian takes a source out of context, she is likely to:
A. misunderstand the intended meaning of historical actions.
<h3>What does it mean to take things out of context?</h3>
This is used to refer to the fact that a person is taking what is being said outside of the meaning that the message is supposed to convey. It has to do with not being able to understand what is said and interpreting it accordingly.
In this situation, when the historian takes things out of their context, then it means that they would not understand the true meaning of the happenings of that period.
Read more on historical events here: brainly.com/question/17040564
#SPJ1
Answer:
c. They wanted immigrants barred from the United States.
Explanation:
Nativism refers to a political position that privileges the welfare and the interests of the people who have been born in certain place (the natives) over immigrants. As more and more immigrants moved to the United States in the late 19th century,<u> the nativist movement gained strength, and they wanted immigrants barred from the United States</u>, especially those coming from China, Italy, and Eastern Europe. The nativists scored some successes, especially with the passing of the Emergency Quota Act of 1921, which placed restrictions on how many immigrants could enter the United States. This Act was further expanded by the Immigration Act of 1924, which banned immigrants from Asia and set strict limits on immigrants from other parts of the world, especially Eastern Europe. This discriminatory policy stayed in force until the passage of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965.
With regard to the the text "The Americans: Reconstruction to the 21st Century" the historical development that contributed most directly to the Market Revolution is the emergence and or increase in new forms of transportation.
It is to be noted that the options referenced are unavailable hence the general answer.
<h3>What is the explanation of the above concept?</h3>
A market revolution was revolutionizing American industry and worldwide trade in the 1820s and 1830s. Independent craftspeople were progressively supplanted by factories and mass manufacturing.
Farms flourished and produced items for distant markets rather than local consumers, exporting them via cheap transportation such as the Erie Canal.
The market revolution spurred tremendous economic expansion and increased personal riches, but it also created a rising lower class of property-less laborers and a series of severe depressions known as "panics," trapping many Americans in never-ending cycles of poverty.
<h3>Who benefited the most from the market revolution?</h3>
Most American farmers' living circumstances improved as a result of the market revolution. For example, a mattress that cost $50 in 1815 (when nearly no one possessed one) cost $5 in 1848. (and everyone slept better).
Learn more about Market Revolution in America:
brainly.com/question/14189684
#SPJ1
Answer:
The term “Byzantine” derives from Byzantium, an ancient Greek colony founded by a man named Byzas. ... In 330 A.D., Roman Emperor Constantine I chose Byzantium as the site of a “New Rome” with an eponymous capital city, Constantinople