1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
hoa [83]
4 years ago
6

Which of these statements is a paradox?

English
2 answers:
Setler [38]4 years ago
8 0
B. Hope that helps :)
Harrizon [31]4 years ago
4 0
A paradox is a statement or saying in which the first part of the statement is essentially the opposite of the ending of the statement.

For example, in your question, the option: "Listen to the sound of silence" is a paradox.

If you think about it, if something is silent, it cannot be heard, and therefore you cannot listen to something that cannot be heard - because it is silent.

This is just one example of how one piece of the sentence negates, or, for another term, is the "opposite" of the second piece.

You might be interested in
Write about why it is important to remember the past.
Arada [10]

Answer: one you don't repeat , you learn an grow from it, but also feelings from it.

Explanation:

Sorry it sound confusing but here it is

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Hey Guys Um this is easy Lol But how do you say "Erizo" In english? oof
Sedbober [7]

Answer:

hedgehog

Explanation:

google

Okay, this is a song from the perspective of God.

The books you think I wrote are way too thick.

Who needs a thousand metaphors to figure out you shouldn’t be a DlCK?

And I don’t watch you when you sleep.

Surprisingly, I don’t use my omnipotence to be a ducking creep.

You’re not going to heaven.

Why the duck would you think I'd ever kick it with you?

None of you are going to heaven.

There’s a trillion aliens cooler than you.

You shouldn’t abstain from r a p e just because you think that I want you to.

You shouldn’t r a p e because r a p e is a ducked up thing to do.

Pretty obvious, just don’t duckin r a p e people, didn’t think I had to write that one down for you.

I don’t think m a s t u r b a t i o n is obscene.

It's absolutely natural and the weirdest ducking thing I’ve ever seen.

You make my job a living he||.

I sent gays to fix overpopulation and boy did that go well.

You’re not going to heaven.

5 0
3 years ago
I need to write a page of I define and state myself and Idek who I am sooo can someone write how they define and state themselve
mina [271]

Answer:

it needs to be in the right context. What context/purpose are you trying to do this for? Is it for a job interview or sth?

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Can you turn this to a present tense??
xz_007 [3.2K]
All of it or just a specific part
4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Paraphrase Madison’s premise in these lines. Why is this a premise and not a claim? The Federalist No
nikdorinn [45]

Answer:

Summary

Madison begins perhaps the most famous of the Federalist papers by stating that one of the strongest arguments in favor of the Constitution is the fact that it establishes a government capable of controlling the violence and damage caused by factions. Madison defines factions as groups of people who gather together to protect and promote their special economic interests and political opinions. Although these factions are at odds with each other, they frequently work against the public interest, and infringe upon the rights of others.

Both supporters and opponents of the plan are concerned with the political instability produced by rival factions. The state governments have not succeeded in solving this problem; in fact, the situation is so problematic that people are disillusioned with all politicians and blame government for their problems. Consequently, a form of popular government that can deal successfully with this problem has a great deal to recommend it.

Given the nature of man, factions are inevitable. As long as men hold different opinions, have different amounts of wealth, and own different amount of property, they will continue to fraternize with people who are most similar to them. Both serious and trivial reasons account for the formation of factions but the most important source of faction is the unequal distribution of property. Men of greater ability and talent tend to possess more property than those of lesser ability, and since the first object of government is to protect and encourage ability, it follows that the rights of property owners must be protected. Property is divided unequally, and, in addition, there are many different kinds of property. and men have different interests depending upon the kind of property they own. For example, the interests of landowners differ from those who own businesses. Government must not only protect the conflicting interests of property owners but must, at the same time, successfully regulate the conflicts between those with and without property.

To Madison, there are only two ways to control a faction: to remove its causes and to control its effects. The first is impossible. There are only two ways to remove the causes of a faction: destroy liberty or give every citizen the same opinions, passions, and interests. Destroying liberty is a "cure worse then the disease itself," and the second is impracticable. The causes of factions are thus part of the nature of man and we must deal with their effects and accept their existence. The government created by the Constitution controls the damage caused by such factions.

The framers established a representative form of government, a government in which the many elect the few who govern. Pure or direct democracies (countries in which all the citizens participate directly in making the laws) cannot possibly control factious conflicts. This is because the strongest and largest faction dominates, and there is no way to protect weak factions against the actions of an obnoxious individual or a strong majority. Direct democracies cannot effectively protect personal and property rights and have always been characterized by conflict.

If the new plan of government is adopted, Madison hopes that the men elected to office will be wise and good men,­ the best of America. Theoretically, those who govern should be the least likely to sacrifice the public good to temporary condition, but the opposite might happen. Men who are members of particular factions, or who have prejudices or evil motives might manage, by intrigue or corruption, to win elections and then betray the interests of the people. However, the possibility of this happening in a large country, such as the United States, is greatly reduced. The likelihood that public office will be held by qualified men is greater in large countries because there will be more representatives chosen by a greater number of citizens. This makes it more difficult for the candidates to deceive the people. Representative government is needed in large countries, not to protect the people from the tyranny of the few, but to guard against the rule of the mob.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which sentence from the conclusion represents a summarizing statement? Select one: a. When all the vampires are iced, take a ste
    10·1 answer
  • Compound sentences are incomplete if they are missing a
    15·2 answers
  • What are flying buttresses? Describe how and why they are used.
    5·1 answer
  • In the passage, what does lady Macbeth fear about her husband?
    14·2 answers
  • 14.Which line from "A Sound of Thunder" best develops Eckels' character?
    8·1 answer
  • R u asking a question or not
    5·2 answers
  • Which line from Chapter One of Jack London’s The Call of the Wild contains dialect?
    12·2 answers
  • 6. Who is the leader of the mob outside the courthouse? In to kill a mockingbird
    14·1 answer
  • I need these definitions please<br> repetition:<br> figurative language:<br> rhetorical device:
    15·2 answers
  • Read the excerpt from Fast Food Nation.
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!