Answer:
I believe it's A and C
Explanation:
A theme is a lesson or message to teach the reader.Also A theme is always has evidence to prove it's the theme
On a moral basis the answer is D. the lines makes the reader understands the importance of conserving nature itself since human activities normally cause more harm to it than good.
Answer:
A participle is a type of verb that can function as a noun or an adjective in a sentence. Participles can be present or past participles. Present participles always end in -ing, and past participles end in -ed unless they are irregular verbs.
Explanation:
The definition above is quite complete, so I will offer some examples here to illustrate the uses of participles.
- Present participles: going, studying, living, dancing, etc.
- Past participles: gone (irregular), studied, lived, danced, etc.
- Functioning as a noun: Studying is the best thing you can do in life.
- Functioning as an adjective: The crying children ran back to their mothers. / The deranged man was seen roaming around town.
Answer:
the answer is for the question is D
The essay initially pretends to be a critique of a type of self-improvement book popular at the time, which claimed to tell how to achieve success. These books defined success strictly in financial terms and assumed that if anyone follows certain steps, they will be able to duplicate the accomplishments of wealthy business owners. However, Chesterton’s review of these books includes a broader social criticism. The focus on the definition of success strictly in terms of money is central to his essay. But wrapped around that issue is the idea that each person can or should perceive success on the same terms as a business leader. He illustrates the point by saying a donkey is successful at being a donkey as much as a millionaire is successful at being a millionaire, so there is no point in calling a donkey a failed millionaire or vice versa.
To counter the common assumptions about success, Chesterton describes people in various walks of life and how each might more realistically succeed. In this description, he suggests that these books falsely pretend to help people succeed in their own social circles and encourage people to try to become something they are not and cannot ever be.
Chesterton says these writers tell the ordinary man how he may succeed in his career—if he is a builder, he may succeed as a builder; or if he is a stockbroker, he may succeed as a stockbroker. Chesterton increases his satire at this point, commenting that the authors say a grocer may become a sporting yachtsman; a tenth-rate journalist may become a peer, which is a British nobleman; and a German Jew may become an Anglo-Saxon. Obviously, these transitions are unlikely or even impossible. Chesterton then criticizes the main assumption of these books and the society that produces it. By claiming that average people can follow in the steps of business tycoons such as Rothschild or Vanderbilt, the book's author is taking part in "the horrible mysticism of money," in which people worship the unlikely possibility of achieving great riches.