Unity of Direction states that a particular team of employees with the same goals as well as the same objectives need to work together to achieve those common goals for the success of the company. It has facilitated several organizations in achieving the objectives of firms that they want to have in the industry.
That would be
C. Oligopoly Conpetition
Answer:
Hi you haven't provided the options to the question so I will just give the answer in my own words and you can check with the options.
Answer is ASSIGNABLE VARIATION.
Explanation:
Variation is a lack of consistency. It can introduce waste and errors into a process, for example, a manufacturing process.
There are two sources of variation which are:
1. Natural variations: are random variations that are expected and are a part of almost every production process which results from a number of chance causes.
2. Assignable variations: are trend factors that can be traced to a specific reason, such as machine tear, fatigued workers or untrained workers, flawed principles, equipment that is not properly adjusted or calibrated, or raw material problems.
According to the question, a machine was not properly set-up/calibrated which caused a wide variation of quality of the products it produced. Since the cause (improper setup/calibration) can be traced to a specific reason, therefore, the type of variation is an example of ASSIGNABLE VARIATIONS.
Answer:
A- Both firms will set the price at $35
Explanation:
When there is no collusion,
When Y charges $40, X's best strategy is to charge $35 since payoff is higher ($59 > $57).
When Y charges $35, X's best strategy is to charge $35 since payoff is higher ($55 > $50).
When X charges $40, Y's best strategy is to charge $35 since payoff is higher ($69 > $60).
When X charges $35, Y's best strategy is to charge $35 since payoff is higher ($58 > $59).
Therefore Nash equilibrium is: ($35, $35).
