<span>Notice a couple of things
different between (A) and (B). It was NOT the first time a biologist
proposed that species changed through time (so it's not B). But it
finally *solidified* that idea by giving "change through time"
(evolution) a MECHANISM. It gave a plausible explanation for WHY
species change over time, in a testable way that made sense and had
evidence to support it.
So it finally dismissed the idea that species are constant.
It also emphasized that the simple presence of *variation* within a population was a key reason for evolution.
While we're at it ... (C) is wrong because it's not *individuals* that
acclimate (adapt) to their environment, but the population (the species)
as a whole.
And (D) is wrong because it had nothing to do with economics or the monarchy.</span>
Answer:
nondominance I think
Explanation:
when something is not dominate.
can u mark me brainliest please
A doctor need to study chemistry: To know and understand the chemicals processes of matter in the body work which is for example insulin, DNA etc. and to study of all processes in a living organism. The three reasons to study chemistry is because chemistry can be useful in clearing up the natural world, preparing people for career opportunities and producing informed citizens. Some outcomes of modern research in chemistry can lead to technologies that aim to benefit the environment, preserve and produce energy, progress human life and multiply our knowledge of the universe. To help the citizen be a more informed citizen is to let them know how things work makes better decisions and use them better
I know it’s prokaryotic if the helps I’m sorry
Answer:
B
Explanation:
The Italian musical command decrescendo (abbreviated decresc.) is an indication to gradually decrease the volume of the music. The musical symbol for decrescendo is a narrowing angle, often followed by another dynamics command (see image). Opposite of crescendo
