Answer:
B
Explanation:
Not only would the US have a better economy, more people, and land, it would increase presence in Pacific.
The Federalists argued that they did not need a Bill of Rights because the people and states kept any powers that was not given to the Federal Government. On the other hand, Anti-Federalists said that a Bill of Rights was necessary in order to safeguard individual liberty.
The Bill of Rights is a list of limits on the Government. For example, the founders saw that the first amendment was a natural right and prohibits from making laws establishing religion and abridging (remove or shorten; rights or privileges) freedom of speech.
Hope this Helps! (:
Answer:
I believe the correct answer is Precedent.
Explanation:
Precedent is a previous situation that has occurred of which someone is now trying to rely upon to solve a similar problem. Now, in Law, Precedent is a previous decision of the Court in a particular case that established a legal principle and is now applied in a similar case with the same facts. For instance, a lawyer when arguing a case in the court of law uses judicial precedents to back up his arguments. Precedents are case laws that judges and justices use in arriving at a just decision. It serves as a guideline.
“Here is how you handled this situation before" clearly shows it is a precedent.
