Question: Why did Abbe Sieyes call for a radical restructuring of French society? Are his views more reflective of the concerns of the First Estate or the Third Estate?
Explanation:
Emmanuel-Joseph Sieyes was a legitimate philosopher who occupied a dynamic part in the "French Revolution." He was commonly recognized as "Abbe." He named for a radical restructuring of the French society because he claimed that the noble individuals were duplicitous and that they troubled the middle class (Bourgeoisie) and the farmers. The Bourgeoisie and the farmers were portion of the Third Estate, thus his opinions were extra worried on this cluster of individuals. He was able to outline the frustrations and complaints of the Third Estate and this, somehow, fueled the French Revolution. He wanted sovereignty to be placed in the hands of people who were primary contributors to public service, such as the Third Estate and not the aristocrats.
Stalin modernized agriculture in the Soviet Union through collectivization. The correct option among all the options given in the question is option "c". This was the method in which all the crops produced, lands, livestock and buildings were taken over by the government. After that the farmers became a waged labor of the government and they were also given a target to fulfill.
Mussolini saw the expansion of Italy as a way to increase national pride. The correct option as per the options provided in the question is option "a".
<span />
D. veto a bill passed by Congress
Even though the President can veto a bill, it can be sent back to Congress if they choose to try to overrule the President's veto. In order for this to happen, both the Senate and the House of Representatives must vote to overrule the President's veto by a 2/3's majority. If that happens, the President's veto is overruled and the bill becomes a law.
The President can NOT declare a federal law unconstitutional nor overturn an unconstitutional state law. The Constitution does not grant the President the power to legislate, rather to execute legislation. Neither does the Constitution of the United States grant courts the power to legislate. The power to legislate was given specifically to Congress. The President does have the right to to submit legislation to Congress.
The Constitution does not give the occupant (the President) of that office the authority to "eliminate" a law that has been passed by Congress, no matter what voters think or believe of that law. The process for repealing a law has to begin in Congress.
The President can NOT vote for a bill that is being discussed in Congress because the Constitution does not grant the President the authority of legislation. The President has the option to veto the bill, after passing through both the House of Representatives and the Senate. But the President may choose to sign or veto the bill. If vetoed, Congress may choose to try to overrule it.
Answer:
U.S. forces flew tens of thousands of Nationalist Chinese troops into Japanese-controlled territory and allowed them to accept the Japanese surrender. The Soviet Union, meanwhile, occupied Manchuria and only pulled out when Chinese Communist forces were in place to claim that territory.
Explanation: