1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Advocard [28]
3 years ago
15

What does the magna carta say?

History
2 answers:
Volgvan3 years ago
6 0
<h2>ANSWER:</h2>

It established the principle that everyone is subject to the law

<h2>EXPLANATION:</h2>

Magna Carta, which means 'The Great Charter', is one of the most important documents in history as it established the principle that everyone is subject to the law, even the king, and guarantees the rights of individuals, the right to justice and the right to a fair trial

amid [387]3 years ago
4 0

established the principle that everyone is subject to the law, even the king, and guarantees the rights of individuals, the right to justice and the right to a fair trial.

You might be interested in
3. Which of the following inference is best supported by Ridwan’s story?
Natali5045456 [20]
The inference where Ridwan inferred Josh going into  the woods and finding a stolen pebble. I'm sorry I don't know the story just here to get points!
5 0
3 years ago
What did the union soldiers believe they were fighting for? what did the confederate soldiers believe they were fighting for? di
Iteru [2.4K]
Union soldiers were fighting for the freedom of slaves and reuniting the states. Confederate soldiers fought for protecting the confederacy. Yes, it did change over the war.
3 0
2 years ago
The United States government is divided into three parts known as the
Andru [333]
Answer:
Montesquieu

Baron de Montesquieu came up with separation of powers, which divides government powers between the 3 branches, so one doesn’t overpower another.
5 0
3 years ago
What is 3 similarities between puritan and pilgrims
Softa [21]

Answer: they belived the Church of England needed a reform and both believed in original sin and the literal interpretation of the bible as God's word

Explanation:

Both the Pilgrims and the Puritans were English Protestants who believed that the Church of England was in need of reform. Although both were strict Calvinists, they differed in approaches to reforming the Church of England. The Pilgrims were more inclined to separate from the church, while the Puritans wanted to reform the church from within. The Pilgrims were the first group of Puritans to seek religious freedom in the New World. As strict Calvinists, members of both groups believed in original sin, predestination and the literal interpretation of the Bible as God’s word.

7 0
3 years ago
The speech says, "A childhood friend once said about Mrs. Parks, 'Nobody
riadik2000 [5.3K]

Explanation:

THE PRESIDENT:  Mr. Speaker, Leader Reid, Leader McConnell, Leader Pelosi, Assistant Leader Clyburn; to the friends and family of Rosa Parks; to the distinguished guests who are gathered here today.

This morning, we celebrate a seamstress, slight in stature but mighty in courage.  She defied the odds, and she defied injustice.  She lived a life of activism, but also a life of dignity and grace.  And in a single moment, with the simplest of gestures, she helped change America -- and change the world.

Rosa Parks held no elected office.  She possessed no fortune; lived her life far from the formal seats of power.  And yet today, she takes her rightful place among those who’ve shaped this nation’s course.  I thank all those persons, in particular the members of the Congressional Black Caucus, both past and present, for making this moment possible.  (Applause.)

A childhood friend once said about Mrs. Parks, “Nobody ever bossed Rosa around and got away with it.”  (Laughter.)  That’s what an Alabama driver learned on December 1, 1955.  Twelve years earlier, he had kicked Mrs. Parks off his bus simply because she entered through the front door when the back door was too crowded.  He grabbed her sleeve and he pushed her off the bus.  It made her mad enough, she would recall, that she avoided riding his bus for a while.

And when they met again that winter evening in 1955, Rosa Parks would not be pushed.  When the driver got up from his seat to insist that she give up hers, she would not be pushed.  When he threatened to have her arrested, she simply replied, “You may do that.”

A few days later, Rosa Parks challenged her arrest.  A little-known pastor, new to town and only 26 years old, stood with her -- a man named Martin Luther King, Jr.  So did thousands of Montgomery, Alabama commuters.  They began a boycott -- teachers and laborers, clergy and domestics, through rain and cold and sweltering heat, day after day, week after week, month after month, walking miles if they had to, arranging carpools where they could, not thinking about the blisters on their feet, the weariness after a full day of work -- walking for respect, walking for freedom, driven by a solemn determination to affirm their God-given dignity.

It’s been often remarked that Rosa Parks’s activism didn’t begin on that bus.  Long before she made headlines, she had stood up for freedom, stood up for equality -- fighting for voting rights, rallying against discrimination in the criminal justice system, serving in the local chapter of the NAACP.  Her quiet leadership would continue long after she became an icon of the civil rights movement, working with Congressman Conyers to find homes for the homeless, preparing disadvantaged youth for a path to success, striving each day to right some wrong somewhere in this world.

And yet our minds fasten on that single moment on the bus -- Ms. Parks alone in that seat, clutching her purse, staring out a window, waiting to be arrested.  That moment tells us something about how change happens, or doesn’t happen; the choices we make, or don’t make.  “For now we see through a glass, darkly,” Scripture says, and it’s true.  Whether out of inertia or selfishness, whether out of fear or a simple lack of moral imagination, we so often spend our lives as if in a fog, accepting injustice, rationalizing inequity, tolerating the intolerable.

Like the bus driver, but also like the passengers on the bus, we see the way things are -- children hungry in a land of plenty, entire neighborhoods ravaged by violence, families hobbled by job loss or illness -- and we make excuses for inaction, and we say to ourselves, that's not my responsibility, there’s nothing I can do.

Rosa Parks tell us there’s always something we can do.  She tells us that we all have responsibilities, to ourselves and to one another.  She reminds us that this is how change happens -- not mainly through the exploits of the famous and the powerful, but through the countless acts of often anonymous courage and kindness and fellow feeling and responsibility that continually, stubbornly, expand our conception of justice -- our conception of what is possible.

Rosa Parks’s singular act of disobedience launched a movement.  The tired feet of those who walked the dusty roads of Montgomery helped a nation see that to which it had once been blind.  It is because of these men and women that I stand here today.  It is because of them that our children grow up in a land more free and more fair; a land truer to its founding creed.

And that is why this statue belongs in this hall -- to remind us, no matter how humble or lofty our positions, just what it is that leadership requires; just what it is that citizenship requires.  Rosa Parks would have turned 100 years old this month. We do well by placing a statue of her here.  But we can do no greater honor to her memory than to carry forward the power of her principle and a courage born of conviction.

(hope this helps can i plz have brainlist :D hehe)

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 3. "Law of the blood" refers to a rule that a child's citizenship depends on the. a.parents' citizenship
    6·1 answer
  • The labor movement in the 19th century abandoned the _________ system, which had allowed workers to gain control over a number o
    7·1 answer
  • What kind of party system is normally associated with first-past-the-post voting? A. two-party system B. one-party system C. mul
    9·1 answer
  • What resulted from the Allied powers' discovery of the atrocities committed
    9·1 answer
  • Conflicts between jeffersonians and hamiltonians during president george washington's first administration led directly to the
    11·1 answer
  • PLEASE I BEGAN YOU PLEASE HELP I'M TIRED AND SAD PLEASE 33 POINTS IF HELPED I BEG OF YOU AND PLEASE GIVE A GOOD ANSWER PLEASEE :
    7·1 answer
  • What was the best way for people to travel in the eastern part of Indian territory
    5·1 answer
  • If you had your own state who would make, enforce, and interpret the laws?
    15·1 answer
  • how did the 13th amendment affect the relationship between the states &amp; the national government and/or the relationship betw
    14·1 answer
  • URGENT PLEASE HELP!! <br><br> What makes the half-breed adhesion to treaty 3 significant.
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!