Answer:
No, Lance's thinking is wrong because you cannot compare decimal numbers with alphabetizing words. For example, if we compare 37.6 to 7.42 using the method of Lance, we would probably say 37.6 is less than 7.42 because 3 is less than 7. But it is wrong. The 3 in 37.6 is in the tens place. On the other hand, 7.42 contains no tense. Therefore, 37.6 is actually higher.
Step-by-step explanation:
No, Lance's thinking is wrong because you cannot compare decimal numbers with alphabetizing words. For example, if we compare 37.6 to 7.42 using the method of Lance, we would probably say 37.6 is less than 7.42 because 3 is less than 7. But it is wrong. The 3 in 37.6 is in the tens place. On the other hand, 7.42 contains no tense. Therefore, 37.6 is actually higher.
9514 1404 393
Answer:
A
Step-by-step explanation:
Your friendly local graphing calculator or spreadsheet can tell you the quadratic regression equation. It best matches choice A.
The answer to this would be 4(w-4)
Answer:
?
Step-by-step explanation: what is your question
Answer:
-5b <= -34
Step-by-step explanation:
The inequality phrase, "at most" is same as "less than or equal to". So the algebraic inequality would be -5b <= -34. To solve for b, divide both sides by -5 and make sure to switch the inequality symbol to >= when dividing or multiplying inequalities by a negative number. So b >= 34 / 5.
