1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sattari [20]
3 years ago
8

How were the intolerable acts different from the earlier stamp act and the townshend acts? what response did these actions provo

ke from the colonists and why?
History
1 answer:
Jobisdone [24]3 years ago
3 0
What response did these actions provoke from the colonists and why? The Intolerable Act limited the political and geographical freedom of the colonists. It was basically a punishment from the British to the colonist over the Boston Tea Party. The Stamp Act and Townshend Act was a tax on goods.
You might be interested in
How did ghana rise to power
nlexa [21]

Answer:

As salt was worth its weight in gold, and gold was so abundant in the kingdom, Ghana achieved much of its wealth through trade with the Arabs. Islamic merchants traveled over two months through the desert to reach Ghana and "do business." They were taxed for both what they brought in and what they took out.

Explanation:

Google is my friend

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why was the ratification of the constitution crucial in virginia?
Soloha48 [4]
New<span> Hampshire became the ninth state to approve the </span>Constitution<span> in June, but the key States of </span>Virginia and New York<span> were locked in bitter debates. Their failure to </span>ratify<span> would reduce the </span>new<span> union by two large, populated, wealthy states, and would geographically splinter it.</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Describe how Black Codes were used to restrict the rights of newly freed African Americans.
Keith_Richards [23]
Black codes were restrictive laws designed to limit the freedom of African Americans and ensure their availability as a cheap labor force after slavery was abolished during the Civil War. Under black codes, many states required Black people to sign yearly labor contracts; if they refused, they risked being arrested, fined and forced into unpaid labor.
Even as former enslaved people fought to assert their independence and gain economic autonomy during the earliest years of Reconstruction. While the codes granted certain freedoms to African Americans—including the right to buy and own property, marry, make contracts and testify in court (only in cases involving people of their own race)—their primary purpose was to restrict Black peoples’ labor and activity. Black people who broke labor contracts were subject to arrest, beating and forced labor, and apprenticeship laws forced many minors into unpaid labor for white planters.
6 0
3 years ago
How was the 2000 presidential election ultimately decided?
Solnce55 [7]

Correct answer:

<h2>C. The US Supreme Court ruled that George Bush won Florida and the presidency.</h2>

Further details:

The 2000 election was extremely close, and the voting in Florida was extremely close. Ultimately, the outcome in Florida would determine the outcome of the nation's election for president. George W. Bush led the vote count on election night by 1,784 votes. That was a narrow enough lead to trigger an automatic machine recount of all ballots. When the machine recount was done, the actual lead for Bush was only 900 votes. The other candidate, Al Gore, was able to use Florida state law to request manual recounting of ballots in four key counties. But because the manual recounts were taking more time than the state law allowed, Gore petitioned the Florida Supreme Court to extend the time, so that those recounts could continue. It was the Bush campaign that appealed to the US Supreme Court, and the US Supreme Court stopped the recount process. When that happened, Florida's electoral votes (and with them, the election win) were awarded to Bush.

3 0
3 years ago
Lincoln Steffens and Claude west more were muckrakers that wrote about st Louis what did they say
IRISSAK [1]

The term muckrakers was used to refer to reformist American journalists who attacked political leaders and instutions for their corrupt practices during the Progressive Era. Most of these journalists were popular due to their publications in popular magazines.

<u>Lincoln Steffens and Claude Wetmore wrote an article about St Louis in  1902 in McClure's Magazine. </u>

They wrote about how paradoxical was that people constinously showed pride in St Louis, and how this contrasted with the awful image of the city. They pointed out how people in St. Louis claimed to have very wealthy inhabitants, together with the best banks, industries, etc., but how at first sight it was possible to observe uncared-for streets, dirty alleys, a filthy hospital, the unfinished construction repairs in the town hall, etc.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What did Herbert Hoover initially believe about the federal governments Role in the Great Depression
    6·1 answer
  • What were the main parts of the league of nations?
    8·1 answer
  • What is one role of state supreme courts?
    5·1 answer
  • Which part of the constitution do you think has helped the document adapt to changing time’s?
    9·1 answer
  • Explain the background and nature of the movement for national unification in italy
    13·2 answers
  • In The Dark Game, what is the central idea of the section about Elizabeth Van Lew? a) Elizabeth Van Lew used her servants to tra
    8·2 answers
  • *Select all that apply*
    15·1 answer
  • Which of these was President Lincolns central goals during the Civil War? End Slavery in all U.S states Preserve the Union Keep
    10·2 answers
  • What maintains the stability of the American currency?
    13·1 answer
  • What features did Maya cities include?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!