1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ElenaW [278]
3 years ago
9

Which of the following would have been allowed to participate in colonial elections?

History
1 answer:
zhannawk [14.2K]3 years ago
3 0

Most likely (D) women were not allowed to vote during the colonial times neither were black people it wasn't until 1870 that voting laws started to change also native Americans were not considered citizens so they didn't have the right at the time to vote either but men had a more open range of rights during these times so I'm assuming that D would be your best answer here

You might be interested in
Which of these powers does the Constitution deny the federal government?
xeze [42]

Answer:

passing laws that apply to actions taken before the law was passed

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Select The answer<br><br><br><br> Giving Brainliest to correct answer
gtnhenbr [62]

Answer:

B is the a

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
In at least 150 words evaluate the effectiveness of the presidential election process in the United States
larisa86 [58]

Every 4 years, the corresponding Tuesday between November 2 and 8, and after almost a year of campaigning, US citizens are ready to vote for their candidates for president. A short time later, in the month of December, the president and vice president of the United States are elected by the vote of only 538 citizens called "electors" of the Electoral College.

The president of the United States is elected in an assembly formed by 538 voters. This figure is equal to the sum of 100 senators + 435 congressmen + 3 delegates from Washington D.C., who does not have senators but delegates. Each state contributes with a block of these delegates, whose number is equal to the sum of their representatives plus their senators or delegates.

On the ballot papers, each candidate for president has the name of their vice president and the political party to which they belong. But these votes do not elect the president for the moment, but rather they choose en bloc the delegates of this political option who will go to the electoral college later. As there are 538 delegates in total, a candidate needs at least 270 to be elected. Which translates into half of those 538 or 269 + 1 = 270 delegates to be elected President of the United States.

When a citizen votes for his or her candidate for president, this person is actually voting to instruct the elector of his or her state where his or her vote should be directed in the Electoral College. For example, if a citizen deposits his ballot for the candidate of the Republican party, this person is really ordering the "elector" of his state to vote for that candidate at the meeting of voters in the electoral college, the same in the Democratic case. Or what is the same, whoever wins the popular vote in a certain state, will get the support of "the electors" and, therefore, the state votes to that candidate and his party.

If it happens that none of the candidates get more than 269 electoral votes, the Twelfth Amendment to the Constitution comes into force and Congress decides who will be the new president. The combination of congressmen from each state is entitled to one vote per state and a simple majority of states gives one winner. This situation has occurred twice in American history. The first occurred in 1801: Thomas Jefferson was elected president; the second occurred in 1825, when President John Quincy Adams was elected.

Critics of the electoral voting system emphasize the fact that a candidate for president, still losing popular elections, can obtain 270 votes and, therefore, become president by the Electoral College.

7 0
3 years ago
PLEASE HELP ITS EASY! Explain how fascism, nationalism and militarism are related.
alexdok [17]

Answer:Fascism is a political ideology that includes both Nationalism and militarism, but Nationalism and militarism are phenomena that can exist hand-in-hand or independently of one another. It is possible to be one and not the other. A Nationalist country will generally stress military strength, but this doesn’t necessarily constitute militarism.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which best describes the style of an argumentative essay?
Arisa [49]

Answer:

narrative

Explanation:

you're writing you're part and your opinion on why the argument is either correct or wrong!

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Explain why no major land routes between aden and damascus
    13·1 answer
  • How did the Tet Offensive impact the Vietnam War?
    6·1 answer
  • What was one of the first things President Hoover did to combat the effects of the Great Depression?
    12·2 answers
  • Which new states /countries were created after World War 1 in Europe?
    5·1 answer
  • Which eastern european nation was the first to reject communism between 1989 and 1991?
    12·2 answers
  • Explain president Eisenhowers “domino theory” as it applies to Southeast Asia
    9·1 answer
  • Those loyal to President Jackson would get government jobs. If you actively campaigned for the Democrats you would get a federal
    7·2 answers
  • How was Prohibition similar and/or different than other changes occurring in the US in the 1920’s?
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements is supported by
    11·2 answers
  • Charles Grandison Finney was a. The religious leader of the Second Great Awakening.b. The governor of Pennsylvania.c. A scientis
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!