Answer:
a. the development of railroad cars that could haul cattle.
Explanation:
The abrupt end of long distance cattle drives in 1885 was primarily due to the development of railroad cars that could haul cattle.
It was the advent of expanding rail road lines that terminated the cattle drive through Kansas because the end points of the cattle trail shifted to meet expanding railroad lines.
It was logical that as the railroads expanded to meet the cattle drive, one had to give way to the other because cattle do stray and trains could haul cattle
Answer:
1,200 shares held at a cost basis of $37.50
Explanation:
Since there are 1,000 shares are purchased
and the stock dividend is 20%
So the number of shares after the dividend is
= 1,000 × (1 + dividend percentage)
= 1,000 × (1 + 0.20)
= 1,000 × 1.20
= 1.200
And, the price per share is
= $44 + $1
= $45
So, the cost basis would be
= $45 ÷ 1.20
= $37.50
hence, the tax status of the investment is 1,200 shares held for cost at $37.50 basis
Answer:
$31.61
Explanation:
In order to determine the amount of interest charged you must first calculate the average daily balance:
average daily balance = [($2,030 x 9) + ($1,450 x 22)] / 31 = $1,618.39
Now we must calculate the daily interest rate:
daily interest rate = 23% / 365 = 0.063%
Finally we multiply the average daily balance times the daily interest rate times the number of days in the billing period:
interest charged = $1,618.39 x 0.063% x 31 days = $31.61
Answer:
The answer is rise, fewer
Explanation:
When the market is more optimistic about a firm, its share price will RISE OR INCREASE as a result, it will need to issue FEWER shares to raise funds that are needed.
Share price can increase as a result of positive economic environment. For example, the company is making consistent profit, prevailing economic or environmental conditions are favouring the company.
When this happens, company will issue lower shares to raise fund because many investors will be looking to buy their shares.
Answer:
Imagine you have just flicked a lighter. If you don’t see the flame, you will naturally try a second time. If after the second attempt it does not strike a flame, you will repeat your action again and again until it does. Eventually, you’ll see the flame and you’ll know that your lighter works. But what if it doesn’t? How long are you going to flick the lighter until you decide to give up?
Our everyday life is full of such decision dilemmas and uncertainty. We constantly have to choose between options, whether we make the most ordinary decisions – should I continue flicking this lighter? – or life-changing choices – should I leave this relationship? We can either keep on doing what we are already used to do, or risk unexplored options that could turn out much more valuable.
Some people are naturally inclined to take more chances, while others prefer to hold on to what they know best. Yet being curious and explorative is fundamental for humans and animals to find out how best to harvest resources such as water, food or money. While looking at the Belém Tower – a symbol of Portugal’s great maritime discoveries – from my office window, I often wonder what drives people to explore the unknown and what goes on in their brains when weighing pros and cons for trying something new. To answer these questions, together with Dr. Zachary Mainen and his team of neuroscientists, we investigate how the brain deals with uncertainty when making decisions.
Explanation:
It is well known that the decision-making process results from communication between the prefrontal cortex (working memory) and hippocampus (long-term memory). However, there are other regions of the brain that play essential roles in making decisions, but their exact mechanisms of action still are unknown.
