The author's strongest support for their statement is the reference to a major claim (Option B). In it, the author alludes to the strongest and clearest declaration that agrees with their statement by quoting the authors of Suburban Nation. This is not an allusion because of the direct nature of this reference (allusion = indirect reference). There is no repetition observed in this paragraph, and the author doesn't comment on what the opposing party believes. Therefore, by logic and by elimination, we can conclude that this is an example of a reference to a major claim.
We can see that a quote that gives an evidence that stories about the legendary hero, King Arthur, are still told by people in modern times is:
"King Arthur is perhaps the most legendary icon of medieval Britain. His popularity has lasted centuries, mostly thanks to the numerous incarnations of his story that pop up time and time again." (Raluca Radulescu, 2017).
<h3>What is quote?</h3>
Quote is actually known to be a way of restating someone's speech or remark for the purpose of writing, learning or evaluation. It is usually marked with quotation marks.
We see that the above quote from Raluca is an evidence that people still tell the story of King Arthur in modern times.
Learn more about quote on brainly.com/question/27143677
#SPJ1
Answer:
Sticks and stones will break my bones but words will never hurt me
Explanation:
Answer:
They thought nature was out to get them, thought everything was altered by God and thanked him for all good and bad, bias toward native Americans at first but not at the end.
Answer:
I think it is B.
Explanation:
By process of elimination. It doesn't do any of the things mentioned in the other options.
It DOES NOT give future insight... (A)
It does show changes in U.S. agriculture. (B)
It DOES NOT identify different herbicides. (C)
It DOES NOT explain insect-resistant crops. (D)
and It DOES NOT clarify how to handle changes. (E)
Hope this helps!
