I'm thinking (C) but i'm not for sure!?!
Hope this helps.....!
Answer:
d). Helen and Evan went to see the movie, and it was a very good movie.
Explanation:
The last sentence i.e. 'Helen and Evan...good movie' demonstrates faulty coordination as the second clause linked through the coordinating conjunction 'and' employs a wrong antecedent 'it.' <u>'It' is a singular pronoun which is incorrectly used to refer to the plural noun 'Helen and Evan</u>.' <u>Another error in the sentence is that the first clause talks about 'Helen and Evan' while the second clause abruptly shifts to the movie which puzzles the meaning of the sentence</u>. Hence, it is erroneous coordination and therefore, <u>option d</u> is the correct answer.
Answer:
hope it helps plz mark me brainliest
Explanation:
An Embarrassing Day of My Life
The proverb “Pride comes before a fall” became very apt for me. My juniors held me in high regard and my classmates laughed at my witticism. I was also good with academics and managed to come in the first three ranks with the minimum of effort. The result was that I became conceited and started making fun of my classmates especially because some of my class fellows laughed at my witticism. This spurred one on and I started misbehaving when some lenient teachers were present.
This went on for few days. I had a good time laughing, joking and showing off to my admiring coteries of followers. None of the teachers had notices what I was doing because they were too busy in teaching.
Your question is incomplete, so I would have to give you a general overview to enable you get to the right answer.
The writer should logically integrate his research <u>after making a claim</u>
When a writer is trying to include a research into his essay, this is a supporting evidence that is used to <u>validate a claim.</u>
<u />
With this in mind, we should know that the author is trying to <u>back up a claim</u> he has already previously made.
For example, if an author is trying to make a point about dangers of bush burning, after he had made a claim that bush burning can worsen the ozone layer (for example), then he would bring evidence which shows how much the ozone layer has deteriorated after series of bush burning over the years
With this in mind, a writer would logically integrate his research <u>after making a claim</u>
Read more here
brainly.com/question/21608125