Because water is the source of life and we need It to live we waste it but maybe somebody poor might need it
Left, had trekked, has visted, couldn't, bigger
Answer:
The author was trying to convey the apathetic attitude of the rich towards the workingman.
Explanation:
The terms used by the author highlighted the negative ways the rich French class and the ruling class viewed the poor workingman. The term louts for example means an uncouth or aggressive person while the term Jack was used to describe the ordinary man who rendered services to the rich.
The author's use of these terms would help the reader to see how lowly the government thought of the poor to the extent that they failed to consider them and were taken unawares at the peasants' revolt.
Answer:
None of these.
Explanation:
A complete predicate is the part of a sentence that contains the verb and everything that is not the subject. This means that the phrase that starts from the verb to the very end, including the modifying phrases that complete the sentence, is the complete predicate.
A complete predicate is different from a predicate in that a predicate just includes the verb and the statement about the subject while a complete predicate will include everything from the verb to the modifying clause or phrase that follows it.
In the given sentence, the subject is "Lindsay" while the verb is "enjoys". So, the complete predicate will be "enjoys surfing but isn't very good", which is not given in the options.
So, the correct answer is "none of these".
<span>D) The author is speculating, but not providing concrete evidence.
Hope this Helps!</span><span>(￣ω￣)
</span>
