Answer:
The correct answer is decrease; increase.
Explanation:
The "Buy American" law was passed in 1933 and established that the US federal government. UU. You must prioritize the purchase of products manufactured in the country. Under certain circumstances, however, the "Buy American" law may not apply when:
- material of American origin has an excessive cost;
- material of American origin is not available in sufficient quantity or volume;
- material of American origin is not in the public interest.
The "Buy American" law may also not apply if the president of the United States or a delegated authority said it on the grounds of reciprocal agreements with other countries defined in the Law on Trade Agreements, the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and the World Trade Organization.
Answer:
Investment in fund b = $15,000
Explanation:
Let us assume funds invested in fund b = x while the sum total of funds invested in fund a & b = Y .ie Y = $6000 + x
Fund A returned $6000 * 3/100 = $180
Fund B returned = x & 10/100 = x/10
8%y(total returns) = funds a returns + fund b returns
8%y = $180 + (x/10)
let is replace y with 6000 + x
(6000 +x) * 8% = 180 + (x/10)
480+ 8x/100 = 180 + (x/10)
480 - 180 = (x/10) - (8x/100)
300 = (10x - 8x )/100
300 = 2x/100
300*100 = 2x
30,000 = 2x
x = 15, 000
Answer:
1) assuming that the credit card company's payments are immediate (1 business day)
April 30,2015, net credit and debit card sales
Dr Cash 13,580
Cr Sales revenue 13,580
2) assuming that the credit card company's payments are immediate (1 business day)
April 30,2015, gross credit and debit card sales
Dr Cash 13,580
Dr Credit card fees 420
Cr Sales revenue 14,000
Given :
Bud exchanges land with an adjusted basis of $ 22,000 and a fair market value of $ 30,000 for another parcel of land with a fair market value of $ 28,000 and $2,000 cash.
To Find :
What is Bud's recognized gain or loss.
Solution :
This is a transaction of like kind exchange.
So, gain or loss to be recognized is :
Therefore, option B) is correct.
Explanation:
This is a complex issue that may reflect on the organizational culture of that company. As a leader, it is necessary to understand the situation and listen to both parties in order to find a favorable solution for the company and the employees. Since Marshall's work is important to the company, firing him at first may not be a favorable decision, what the leader can do is provide feedback to him about his interpersonal relationship at the company.
As an effective leader, it is necessary to constantly monitor the work and the relationship between employees, in which case it is necessary to understand the reason for Marshall's behavior and try to change the parameters and procedures that may be facilitating this behavior. It is necessary for him to understand that despite being an effective worker, the company is an integrated system that must be in perfect synchronicity for it to be successful in the market.
What the leader could do in this case then is to try to change the code of organizational ethics, seek training and psychological assistance for Marshall if necessary, talk to the workers who are part of the conflict to understand the situation in the best way, to seek a work redesign. , etc.
