6; D, Prophet of Islam.
7; C, Safavid ruler.
8; E, Caliph recognized by Sunni Muslims.
9; B, Ruler of Mali.
10; A; Ruler of Ethiopia.
Hope this helped, sweetie!
You didn't attach the map you were shown, but I can tell you what that map would look like.
Israel had gained control of several sections of territory which they had not previously controlled. In the south, Israel now held control of the Gaza Strip and the Sinai Peninsula (which had been held by Egypt). Along the Jordan River, Israel now controlled the region known as the West Bank (which was a region where Palestinians lived). In the north Israel had taken the Golan Heights away from the control of Syria.
In negotiations after the war, there were thoughts of returning land for peace, but that really only has happened in the case of Israel's relationship with Egypt. (Israel and Egypt signed a lasting peace agreement in 1979.)
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Non-violent resistance can be successful because it is a powerful way to show discontent to any injustice or support to another valid issue, conveying the message that violence is no need to unite people against the support of a common cause. Non-violent demonstrations and protests have demonstrated to be so powerful to make changes in different places of the world.
The examples of non-violent resistance that you have learned about are the cases of Mahatma Gandhi, the pacifist leader in India, who was the first to use non-violent demonstrations. Another good example would be Dr- Martin Luther King Jr, who supported non-violent demonstrations such as the March to Washington.
The issue that I feel non-violent resistance could encounter and limit success is that people cannot defend themselves in the case of police aggression or other types of aggression, such as another group who favor violence to stop those pacifist demonstrations.
