Answer:
-2? maybe
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer: (7 + d) 4 and 4 (7 + d)
Step-by-step explanation:
<em>4 (d + 7) = 4d + 28</em>
<em />
(7 + d) 4 = 28 + 4d (flipped version of 4d + 28)
4 (7 + d) = 28 + 4d (the same)
Answer:
The correct option is;
C. The pattern is random, indicating a good fit for a linear model
Step-by-step explanation:
A graph that has the residuals (the difference between the value observed and the value expected (regression analysis) on the vertical axis and the variable that is not affected by the other variables (independent variable) on the x or horizontal axis is known as a residual plot
A linear regression model is suited in a situation where the points are dispersed randomly on both sides of the horizontal axis
Therefore, given that the first point is below the horizontal axis and the next point is above the horizontal axis, while the third and the fourth points are below the horizontal axis, the fifth, sixth, and seventh points are above the horizontal axis and the eighth point is below the horizontal axis, the points are random around the horizontal axis, indicating the suitability of a linear regression model.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Here are the steps to follow when solving absolute value inequalities:
Isolate the absolute value expression on the left side of the inequality.
If the number on the other side of the inequality sign is negative, your equation either has no solution or all real numbers as solutions.
If your problem has a greater than sign (your problem now says that an absolute value is greater than a number), then set up an "or" compound inequality that looks like this:
(quantity inside absolute value) < -(number on other side)
OR
(quantity inside absolute value) > (number on other side)
The same setup is used for a ³ sign.
If your absolute value is less than a number, then set up a three-part compound inequality that looks like this:
-(number on other side) < (quantity inside absolute value) < (number on other side)
The same setup is used for a £ sign
