1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
babunello [35]
3 years ago
15

Does George Washington's account contradict or support the account in the newspaper? Give two examples to support your response

History
2 answers:
Strike441 [17]3 years ago
7 0

Sample response: Both the newspaper account and Washington's account explain that the British were defeated when they panicked on the battlefield. But the newspaper account explains the loss differently. It says, for example, that there was an unknown number of enemy fighters, while Washington says there were no more than 300.

kenny6666 [7]3 years ago
3 0
<span>Both the newspaper account and Washington's account explain that the British were defeated when they panicked on the battlefield. But the newspaper account explains the loss differently. It says, for example, that there was an unknown number of enemy fighters, while Washington says there were no more than 300.</span>
You might be interested in
Answer the following question in 2-3 COMPLETE SENTENCES:
iris [78.8K]

Answer:

Explanation:

The stamp act is an act of parliament in 1765 that exacted revenue from the american colonists by imposing a stamp duty on newspapers and other documents and the Townsend acts or Townshend duties is a series of british acts of parliament passed in 1768-67

4 0
3 years ago
What are four American inventions that revolutionized agriculture, manufacturing,and communications between 1831 and 1876
lyudmila [28]
Steam Boat 
Riding Plow
Telegram
Milling Machine

4 0
3 years ago
In this unit, you learned that Oklahoma experienced a great deal of change in the late
vampirchik [111]

Answer:

Explanation:The dawn of the twentieth century found the region between Kansas and Texas in transition. Once set aside as a permanent home for indigenous and uprooted American Indians, almost two million acres of Indian Territory had been opened to settlement in 1889. Joined with a strip of land above the Texas Panhandle, the two areas were designated "Oklahoma Territory" by an act of Congress the following year. Subsequent additions of land surrendered by tribal governments increased the new territory until it was roughly equal in size to the diminished Indian Territory. Land was the universal attraction, but many white pioneers who rushed into Oklahoma Territory or settled in Indian Territory hoped for a fresh start in a new Eden not dominated by wealth and corporate power. Freedmen dreamed of a new beginning in a place of social justice where rights guaranteed by the Constitution would be respected. Most Native Americans, whose land was being occupied, had come to realize the futility of their opposition to the process that would soon unite the two territories into a single state. A few Indians, most wedded to tribal traditions, simply ignored a process they could not understand and refused to participate in an allotment of land they had once been promised would be theirs "forever."

The birth of the new state occurred in an era of protest and reform. Populist and Progressive currents merged to sweep reform-minded Democrats to an overwhelming victory in 1906 in the selection of delegates to a Constitutional Convention tasked with forging Indian and Oklahoma territories and the Osage Nation into a single state. The constitution drafted at the convention in Guthrie in 1906–07 was not as "radical" as Pres. Theodore Roosevelt suggested, but it did reflect its authors' belief that the will of the people, not powerful corporations, should determine state policy. A series of provisions, including a corporation commission, popular election of many state officials, initiative and referendum, preferential balloting for U.S. senators, a single term for the governor, a weak legislature, and inclusion of details in the constitution normally enacted by statute, reflected the founding fathers' conviction that corporate influence on state government should be held in check.

5 0
3 years ago
Why did merchants have such low status in Tokugawa society
Leviafan [203]
Merchants had such low status because selling things was considered being greedy.hope it helped
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What were the disadvantages to using wood and water power
trapecia [35]

Answer:

umm?

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What do all the Constitution principles have in common? A. They prevent government from becoming too powerful. B. They emphasize
    9·2 answers
  • Define Presiden Nixon's policy of Vietnamization
    10·2 answers
  • Why was the USS Maine sent to Cuba in 1898
    11·2 answers
  • What is the fourteenth amendment
    6·2 answers
  • In 2003, state political leaders found themselves staring at a $10 billion shortfall in the upcoming budget period. one way to c
    5·1 answer
  • Why did the industrial revolution start in Britain? What was special art its banking system that let it begin? 40 POINTS!
    6·2 answers
  • Which is the best definition of sovereignty?
    6·1 answer
  • What are some related events from the Berlin Crisis?
    8·1 answer
  • What limit is placed on the exercise of individual rights?
    9·2 answers
  • Which term defines a work of art created by painting on damp plaster?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!