Answer:
Compulsory: Required of all people in a particular group
Eclectic: Describes something that uses information from a variety of sources
Rote: Method of learning by repeating something over and over again
I think it's like talking or thinking completely off topic, but I am not sure
Answer:
<h2>The sight of the city of London in the early morning is very beautiful. According to Wordsworth, nothing is more beautiful in this world than the scene visible from the Westminster Bridge early in the morning.</h2>
Explanation:
<h2>________________________(๑˙❥˙๑)</h2><h2>
<em><u>PLEASE</u></em><em><u> MARK</u></em><em><u> ME</u></em><em><u> BRAINLIEST</u></em><em><u> AND</u></em><em><u> FOLLOW</u></em><em><u> M</u></em><em><u> E</u></em><em><u> AND</u></em><em><u> SOUL</u></em><em><u> DARLING</u></em><em><u> TEJASWINI</u></em><em><u> SINHA</u></em><em><u> HERE</u></em><em><u> ❤️</u></em></h2>
Hi there!
»»————- ★ ————-««
I believe your answer is:
Passive
»»————- ★ ————-««
Here’s why:
⸻⸻⸻⸻
- In the sentence given, the subject is getting acted upon. The sentence focuses on the action and emphasizes it.
- Active voice would focus on what action the subject does.
⸻⸻⸻⸻
»»————- ★ ————-««
Hope this helps you. I apologize if it’s incorrect.
Answer:
c. Deductive, analogy
Explanation:
In this scenario, the argument being made would be classified as a deductive analogy. An analogy basically compares two things together in order to explain an idea, most of the time these two things have something in common that allows that idea to be better understood. In this scenario, they are comparing a rabid dog and an unexploded bomb. Since the unexploded bomb is the object that the rabid dog is being compared to it would be considered the conclusion, and since the conclusion is being applied first in the second part of the argument you are therefore using deductive logic.