1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
otez555 [7]
3 years ago
13

how can we interpret and compare speeches from president lincoln and Obama, and from Frederick Douglass, to help us analyze the

US construction
History
1 answer:
zavuch27 [327]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

I have a short article included to help.

Explanation:

Frederick Douglass’s 1845 Narrative continues to be a popular pedagogical text for high school and college curricula for the didactic reason that Douglass is a strong advocate for the benefits of reading and writing. Responding to the rumor that he might have been a well-educated freeman masquerading as a runaway slave, the educational elements of Douglass’s autobiography were partially intended to explain the source of his eloquence—tracing his beginning lessons in penmanship with neighborhood boys in Baltimore to his clandestine reading of The Columbian Orator. By including the letter he forged in his first escape attempt, he implies the message that literacy set him free. Setting a precedent for many African American literary figures who came after him, including Ralph Ellison’s fictionalized Invisible Man and the real-life President Barack Obama, Douglass fashioned a compelling explanation of his coming-to-voice, which even competes with, and eventually eclipses, the drama of his escape in the book’s final chapters.

One of the most dramatic emblems of Douglass’s literary education is the moment he becomes moved to address the ships on the Chesapeake Bay—it is a picture in words of his oratorical birth. In William Lloyd Garrison’s preface to Frederick Douglass’s 1845 Narrative, he celebrates the theatrical scene: Reduced to total abjection by the brutality of his slavemaster Covey, Douglass retreats to the Chesapeake shore on Sunday, and gives a moving speech to the white-sailed ships on the horizon. Performing as if he were on stage, Douglass laments his misery, questions whether there is a God, and concludes that since Covey is probably going to kill him anyway, he might as well try to escape. According to Garrison, Douglass’s oratorical tableau is the visual and literary epitome of the basic human desire for freedom—a “whole Alexandrine library of thought, feeling, and sentiment” (7). Like Garrison’s investment in The Liberator’s 1850 masthead, adapting Josiah Wedgwood’s image of a shackled and kneeling slave asking, “Am I not a man and a brother?,” Garrison points Douglass’s readers to this moving portrait of suffering with the hope that they, too, will vicariously experience the slave’s resolution for freedom.1 Although Garrison seems to have hoped that the scene would principally inspire sympathy for Douglass among his white readers, in Douglass’s hands it also turns into a representation of literary agency with lasting significance for African American literature. Douglass’s figure of himself—embodied in words—as communicating with the nation is echoed in similar moments of coming-to-voice in African American literary figures to the present day, and has become one of the most enduring elements of his rhetorical legacy.

Douglass’s waterside speech is a curiously artistic milestone in antislavery testimony even beyond its anguished desperation. Garrison might have pointed to many other dramatic passages—such as the whipping of Aunt Hester, the slave auction, the abandonment of Douglass’s grandmother, or even the fight with Covey—but he chose instead to highlight this highly literary, if not overwrought, transformational moment in Douglass’s consciousness. In his essay on the aesthetic elements of Douglass’s Narrative, written over forty years ago, Albert Stone argued this speech was an expression of Douglass’s artistic impulses to imaginatively synthesize his thought processes concerning freedom (72).2 But put more bluntly, he might have admitted that Douglass probably never gave this speech at all. Part of what makes Douglass’s first autobiography so effective is his ability to blend his largely factual account of slavery so seamlessly with the inventions of art. Like his deliberately falsified account of his grandmother’s abandonment and death, whose purple passages remained in his autobiographies even after he admitted that they were not true, Douglass’s speech is one of the more glaring examples of his departure from conventional fact in telling his story

You might be interested in
What brought an end to the Zhou dynasty?
kari74 [83]
When the army of the state of Qin captured the city of Chengzhou and the last Zhou <span>ruler, King Nan, was murdered.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
25 Points! Pls help me! Due in 5 minutes!!!
tensa zangetsu [6.8K]

Answer:

A) Communication improvements. C) Embargo Act of 1807. D) New power sources.

Explanation:

So options A,C, and D are the correct answers. Have a great day.

7 0
3 years ago
Say something if you’re taking primavera online classes for history right now
Varvara68 [4.7K]

Answer:yep am a online Student

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did World War One begin?
Ira Lisetskai [31]
World War 1 began after the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand, the heir to the Austro-Hungary empire in 1914. Serbia was still under their rule and killed the heir for independence. Serbia formed an alliance with Russia, and Austro Hungary formed an alliance with France and great Britain. Which caused other countries to "pick a side" belguim sided with serbia and germany sided with Austro-Hungary. The war caused Europe to fall in power 

hope this helps
7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of these was NOT a condition of the Missouri Compromise?
Vadim26 [7]

Answer:The provisions of the Missouri Compromise stated in part that Missouri would be admitted to the Union as a slave state.

Explanation:

The Missouri Compromise was a decision made in the United States in 1819 to admit the states of Missouri and Maine as members of the Union.

In 1819, the admission of the state of Missouri to the United States was on the agenda of the Senate. As there were equal numbers of representatives of slave and free states in the Senate, it was decided to reach a compromise in order to maintain the balance: two states were going to be adopted at the same time, one free and the other slave. In addition to slave Missouri, Maine, which did not allow slavery, became a member of the United States. The demarcation line for slavery was also determined, as slavery would be allowed only south of the 36º 30' north latitude (plus the state of Missouri, which was north of it).

8 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • What battle did Stalin defeat Hitler?
    10·1 answer
  • How did cultural values divide traditionalists and modernists
    5·1 answer
  • Part of the Union's strategy for defeating the Confederacy was to form a _______
    8·1 answer
  • How were craft guilds financed
    12·1 answer
  • Which are characteristics of trade in ancient Egypt?
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following was the goal of Susan B. Anthony and Elizabeth Cady Stanton’s National Woman Suffrage Association?
    15·2 answers
  • Select all that describe the state bird
    8·1 answer
  • Which Native American groups attempted to resist the Indian Removal Act? (Select all that apply.)
    10·1 answer
  • Supply and Demand Equilibrium
    8·1 answer
  • Pls help
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!