How did the treaty of versailles lead to the rise of hitler?

1 answer:

3 0

The treaty contributed to WWII because it was extremely harsh. The Germans were forced to admit all guilt for WWI, and their country was bankrupt. They were angry and living in extreme poverty. They had nothing, and this led to a chance for someone like Hitler to rise up. The rest of the world viewed Germany with contempt, so they lashed out. <span> Hitler was an incredible speaker and leader and his oratory skills are directly linked to how the Treaty of Versailles contributed to his rise in power as without them he would not have been fully able to express his feelings and opinions to the people. The Germans felt his passion because they were just as angry about the Treaty of Versailles and its effects on Germany.</span>

You might be interested in

The King of Sardinia Victor Emmanuel II created the Italian Nationalist Movement called Risorgimento to unify Italy. *

Goshia [24]

Answer:

I got true

Explanation:

I looked it up :)

- sidney

3 0

3 years ago

Name the leaders of Each Country during WW1

marin [14]

America : Woodrow Wilson

Germany : Friedrich Ebert

great Britain : David Lloyd George

7 0

3 years ago

How did the use of mercenaries by the roman army contribute to the eventual collapse of the empire?

guapka [62]

Answer:

In desperate need of soldiers to help with the invasions, Rome hired mercenaries to defend its borders. According to some historians, many were Germanic warriors who did not feel loyalty to Rome. ... The most evident factor of the Roman Empire's fall was the invasions.

Explanation:

5 0

3 years ago

As a result of Manifest Destiny, westward expansion in the mid-1800s_____. A-increased dramatically B-slowed significantly C-nei

disa [49]

So the question ask what is the result in the westward expansion in the mid 1800's and the best answer among your choices is letter A. increased dramatically. I hope you are satisfied with my answer and feel free to ask for more if you have clarifications

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Question 6(Multiple Choice Worth 4 points) The Supreme Court ruled in Miranda v. Arizona that people

kirza4 [7]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Unfortunately, you forgot to include the options for this question,

However, trying to help you, we can answer based on our knowledge of this topic.

The Supreme Court ruled in Miranda v. Arizona that people "that are under arrest must be read their rights by law enforcement."

We are talking about the Supreme Court case in which the Warren Court dealt with the rights of the accused: Miranda v. Arizona.

Miranda v. Arizona was a case decided by the Warren court on June 13, 1966. Ernesto Miranda had a written confession for kidnap and r*pe, but the issue was that police interrogated him without the presence of a lawyer, neither the police officers told him he had the right to call a lawyer.

The Court's decision favored Miranda, overturned his conviction and the case was sent to Arizona for retrial.

6 0

3 years ago