My favorite memory is when my father was completing his work Objective by Evaluating the Synthesis of chemical compounds and Modifying them, to create an experiment with Independent and Dependent variables. I had come into his office to work on English homework. I was working on Clauses. When I asked my Dad what he was mumbling about he said that the compounds were Indivisible, and that he needed to Eradicate one of the variables, and that the Eradication of one of the variables was Imperative to how well the experiment went. This is my favorite memory because we got to work together.
P.S you can use this as your own if you'd like.
The logical inference a person can make about the “good lesson” the narrator wants to teach the American artist is:
- <u>He would have shown him how there was no freedom in China twenty years ago</u>
<u />
According to the given question, the narrator says that the American artist is making unnecessary protests about having so little freedom.
This shows an irony that he does not appreciate the freedom he enjoys and feels he lacks freedom.
As a result of this, we can see that the logical inference we can make about the good lesson which he wants to teach the American artist is that he would show him how little freedom there was in China twenty years ago and how he enjoys freedom.
Read more here:
brainly.com/question/8369124
Benvolio blames the initial fight that takes place in Romeo and Juliet on Tybalt and the servants of the Capulet.
