I think that you might have to focus on two particular elements in your analysis. The first would be the argument, itself. What is used to support the thesis being advocated? What facts in evidence is submitted? How cogent and coherent is the overall argument? It might require you to sketch out the basic argument and the subpoints used to defend or support it. I think that the next level you will have to undergo would be to analyze how the argument is written and how it is presented? Addressing the tone of the article, as well as the word choice and how it is presented in terms of persuasion will be involved here. I would like to suggest another source that might help with your study here. Danica McKellar has written some excellent work on the gender bias in mathematics. I would examine her arguments and study her tone and word choice in order to increase your background knowledge of the field.
there are so many,i assume during 1801 and or 1845,at it's peak.when the parliment thought putting fences around villagers farms for growing crops and grazing animals was a good idea..the consequences were bad to society.the were literally evicted from homes,and forced to live in city slums.the government thought they could find new jobs with the industrial revolution.but not the case.these people had nothing.they were not allowed to go back to their villages to get firewood for warmth and not allowed to take any food from their old land.there is a kool poem about this written back in the day it's called the deserted village.i forget the author.but it really tells about the suffering people went through. Hope that helps!
Expansionary monetary policy, contractionary fiscal policy
