Vladimir seems to be the only person who undestands his father´s illness.Uncorrupted by the social world in which he grew up thanks to his father, he is capable of trying to connect with Ivan.Ivan himself can see the look in the eyes of his son, he understands Vaya´s feelings are different from the falsity of the wife and daughter.
Lisa shares her views with those of her mother.More materialistic and self- indulgent she is deeply disturbed by her father´s indisposition.When in the room where his father is lying she and her mother comment on the acting of Sarah Bernhardt,she notices her father´s disapproval and leaves the room.She has not been there to take care of his father but to fulfil a sense of duty given her position.
Tolstoy appears to support the view of the boy.Ivan has learned a lesson about the material world, and hipocrisy and the boy sympathises with the father.
I would say it’s the first or second. I’m leaning towards the second. Mostly because I don’t know key ideas from this story.
The way "Lobo, the King of Currumpaw" illustrates revenge is the attempts of Lobo to avenge the death of his mate and fellow wolf, Blanca.
<h3>What is Revenge?</h3>
This refers to the desire to seek vengeance for a perceived wrong done to a person to get retribution.
Hence, we can see that the revenge was not justified as Lobo became careless and was captured and killed by the humans who had used the killing of Blanca to make him careless
Read more about "Lobo, the King of Currumpaw" here:
brainly.com/question/17735107
#SPJ1
Main Points, Transitions and Quotations would be the best answer for this.
