Without you providing us with the diagram, I can still offer you some thought about the effect of the Smoot-Hawley Act and protective tariffs. Sponsored by Senator Reed Smoot and Congressman Willis Hawley, the intent of their tariff act was to protect American jobs during the economic crisis of the Depression. However, when the US imposed protective tariffs, other nations retaliated with tariffs of their own. Thus American exports and imports were cut in half and the Depression grew worse, not better.
We should note this too: While economists agree that Smoot-Hawley worsened the Depression, how large of a factor it was is a matter that economists debate. Some say the tariffs played a minor role compared to other aggravating factors of the Depression. However, the Foundation for Economic Education asserts that the economists who want to minimize the role of the Tariff Act are wrong to do so. Underestimating the negative impact of protective tariffs can be very dangerous economically -- then and now.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
People say that the two party system was created because the US voting system is winner take all. For example, if a presidential candidate gets the majority of votes in Florida he gets all the electoral college votes for that state it is not split between the candidates.
None of those answer choices reflect this but I feel like C is the closest.
Answer: A. Communism collapsed in the Soviet Union, while it continues to dominate Chinese politics.
Explanation:
Defined natural to life, liberty, and property.
hope it help
Answer: Leaders agreed that a stronger national government was needed.
Explanation:
The American economy immediately after the American Revolution had a lot of subsistence farmers with little access to hard currency and as a result could not pay off debts they owed. Veterans from the war were in debt as well as they were finding it difficult to get money they were owed by the government.
This led to widespread discontent that boiled over to the Shay's rebellion. As the dissidents marched on a Federal armoury, the Federal government could do nothing as they had very limited powers and could not fund their soldiers as a result.
When the rebellion was eventually put down by state militia, people saw the need for a stronger national government that could react to such problems and more should the need arise.
