Answer:
there is three parts to this answer
Step-by-step explanation:
this first part is
A= 2.5
B= 49 feet
and finally
C= 0.75 seconds
Answer:
Pecan cheesecake = $11
Strawberry cheesecake= $19
Step-by-step explanation:
To solve this, we will need to set up a system of equations:
Let's call "Pecan cheesecakes" 'x', and
"Strawberry cheesecakes" 'y'.
We can set up the equations once we have our variables:
276= 13x + 7y
295 = 13x +8y
We will need to subtract these equations from each other to get rid of the 'x' variable. This gives us:
295 = 13x+ 8y
-
276 = 13x+ 7y
19 = y
Therefore, Strawberry cheesecakes cost $19. Plug this into an equation to get the value of 'x':
276= 13x + 7(19)
276 = 13x + 133
143 = 13x
x= $11.
Therefore, Pecan cheesecakes cost $11.
Answer:
a
The null hypothesis is 
The alternative hypothesis is 
b

c

d
There no sufficient evidence to conclude that 75% of adults say that it is morally wrong to not report all income on tax returns
Step-by-step explanation:
From the question we are told that
The sample size is 
The number that said it is morally wrong is 
The level of significance is 
The population proportion is 
Generally the sample proportion is mathematically represented as

=> 
=> 
The null hypothesis is 
The alternative hypothesis is 
The standard error is mathematically represented as

=> 
=> 
Generally the test statistics is mathematically represented as

=> 
=> 
Generally the p-value is mathematically represented as

From the the z-table

=> 
=> 
From the calculation 
Hence we fail to reject the null hypothesis
Thus there no sufficient evidence to conclude that 75% of adults say that it is morally wrong to not report all income on tax returns
Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:
Since the second equation is fully simplified and we know what x equals, we plug the entire equation of x in for x in the top equation:

Now solve for y.

Now plug y back into the bottom equation and solve for x.

