Answer:
B. nationalism.
Explanation:
The nationalism that originated in the times of the French Revolution changed over the years. By the beginning of the 20th century, most European peoples identified with a nation state and were willing to defend or go for interests of a homeland.
The nationalism fueled competition over economic, social aspects, and was best explained by the rivarly between the French and the Germans.
Prussian -French war caused the tensions to increase among the former.
The rivalry was also felt between the English and the Germans over the seas. The increased trade and foreign trade also was a important force that brought tensions in other continents.
The concept of Nationalism emerged to the most, in the military propagandas, and the racial and ethnic policies from the Central `powers.
<em>A fierce state of things promoted a national army in numbers that were unprecedent to the times- and the war effort ultimately was propeled by nationalistic groups that prevailed among societies.</em>
Answer:
Self Interest or self-interested.
Answer:
Committees are an essential part of the legislative process. Senate committees monitor on-going governmental operations, identify issues suitable for legislative review, gather and evaluate information, and recommend courses of action to the Senate.
Explanation:
Hope it helps :)
Answer: the representation of states in Congress.
<em>The Great Compromise and the Three-Fifths Compromise both focused on </em><em>the representation of states in Congress.</em>
Both of these compromises were devised during the United States Constitutional Convention in 1787. The Great Compromise resolved a dispute between small population states and large population states. The large population states wanted representation in Congress to be based on a state's population size. The smaller states feared this would lead to unchecked dominance by the big states; they wanted all states to receive the same amount of representation. The Great Compromise created a bicameral (two-chamber) legislature. Representation in the House of Representatives would be based on population. In the Senate, all states would have the same amount of representation, by two Senators.
The Three-Fifths Compromise was a way of accounting (somewhat) for the population of slaves in states that permitted slavery. For taxation and representation purposes, the question was whether slaves should count in the population figures. (They were not considered voting citizens at that time.) The Three-Fifths Compromise said that three out of every five slaves could be counted when determining a state's population size for determining how many seats that state would receive in the House of Representatives.
The correct answer would be C they have often erred.
If that isn't correct, then try B. yet I don't recall them being "out to get him"
Hope this helps
Mark brainliest?
