Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:
Who said that:
Saint Francis, what a change is here! Is Rosaline, whom thou didst love so dear, So soon forsaken? young men's love then lies Not truly in their hearts, but in their eyes. Jesu Maria, what a deal of brine Hath wash'd thy sallow cheeks for Rosaline! How much salt water thrown away in waste, To season love, that of it doth not taste! The sun not yet thy sighs from heaven clears, Thy old groans ring yet in my ancient ears; Lo, here upon thy cheek the stain doth sit Of an old tear that is not wash'd off yet
Answer:
Friar Laurence
Explanation:
The excerpt shown in the question above is one of the words of Friar Laurence, a character from "Romeo and Juliet" who was very friendly and adviser to Romeo. Friar is questioning Romeo about the triviality of his passions, because the day before Romeo was suffering from love for Rosaline, but the next day he is in love with Juliet and he no longer remembered who Rosaline was.
"Romeo and Juliet" is a play written by Shakespeare and tells the story of forbidden love of two young people who have enemy families.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although you did not include the name of the article, the link to it, or any further reference, doing some research we can comment on the following.
Nathan Thornburg's position on immigration is the following.
He considers that the United States federal government has to assume a definite posture on the issue of immigration that still affects the country. In his article of 2007 titled "A Case for Amnesty," Thornburg questions the way some politicians have approached the complicated issue of immigration, the consequences for the country, and the affectation of many immigrants.
He cites some examples such as the posture of the late Republican Senator John McCain.
The point of Thornburg is that the Amnesty bill could have positive political consequences for the American government, and somehow alleviate the flux of immigration to the United States.
Nathan Thornburg is a Senior Editor for "Time" magazine, and has published other important articles such as "Dropout Nation."
The Awnser is going to be 15
Answer: D) The King attempted to trap Mamad, but underestimated the man's dedication
Explanation:
King did want to attempt to trap Mamad, but he did not realize that Mamad only speaks of the things he can truly guarantee or that he saw with his own eyes. That is why he refused to say King will surely come to the feast. That is where Mamad's dedication lies, how he manages never to lie, and how King failed to fool Mamad.
