Answer: In the sentence, Fred sent his Grandmother an emall all on his new computer, 'his grandmother' is an indirect object.
Explanation:
Indirect object of any sentence is its noun or pronoun that obtain the action of a Verb in an indirect manner. To know the indirect object, ask the question of 'to whom', 'for whom', or 'for what' and the answer to this question will be the indirect object. In the sentence, 'Fred sent his Grandmother an emall all on his new computer' - Fred is a subject, sent is a verb, an email is a direct object and his grandmother is an indirect object. To whom did Fred send an email? His grandmother.
1. Assuming that the underlined words are 'Carl Sandburg,' the correct answer is A. simple subject. Although you may be led to believe this is a complete subject (because it consists of more than one word), in fact, it is not. Carl Sandburg is the name and the surname of one person, which is why it is considered to be a simple, rather than a complete subject.
2. Assuming that the underlined words are '<span>served as a soldier during the Spanish-American War,' the correct answer is D. complete predicate. As you can see, these words include the simple verb served, as well as all other words which modify, or describe that verb. This is why this is complete, rather than a simple predicate. Simple predicate would be only the word served.
3. Assuming that the underlined words are 'would influence,' the correct answer is B. simple predicate. Similarly to the first sentence, you may be led to believe this is complete because there are more than one word in the phrase. However, the verb phrase would influence is considered to be one entity given that it is only a particular tense of that verb. Even if it said 'had been influencing' instead of 'would influence,' it would still be a simple predicate.</span>
No you do not. Hope that helps
Answer: name and date lauv
Explanation: