That statement is true
The commander's name is Carleton. By that point, the british empire already started to made effort to abolish slavery before united states. So Carleton believed that returning the escaped slaves to Washington would be dishonorable.
Washington keep pushing him for several years for the return of the slaves until he eventually gave up and asked for compensation instead.
We can say that a person is biased when their opinion or recollection of something favors one <u>person, idea, or group</u> more so than the other. It is the inability to remain impartial.
Though it cannot be denied that the statement that was given by Lum May as to the events of November 3rd, 1885 may be biased, I do not believe his account of the occurrence is overly biased. He describes the violent nature of the altercation, the burning down of Chinese homes, and the trauma that overtook the sanity of his wife.
All of these statements made by Lum May are backed by evidence such as:
- The piles of ashes where Chinese homes once stood
- A similar recollection of the events from hundreds of Chinese citizens who were present
- The unstable nature of his wife's mental health.
All of this leads us to believe that Lum May is a credible source for the events of <em>November 3rd, 1885 </em>in Tacoma.
Unlike the credible testimony of Lum May, we can infer that the letter from James Wickersham is not only extremely biased in nature, but also an overwhelmingly unreliable source of information. Many of the participants of that day were indicted for their actions, giving Mr. Wickersham much to lose were he to provide accurate information.
The evidence supporting the statements of Lum May allows us to infer that her recollection of the events is credible and not overly swayed by bias. However, the contradictory statements declared by James Wickersham and the repercussions he may face should he tell the truth, point towards his letter being an unreliable and overly biased source.
To learn more visit:
brainly.com/question/25061293?referrer=searchResults
Written sources go back to about 5500 years ago, when marketers started using labels to keep books and accounts.
The original markings were in the form of thumbnails and symbols, and different ways of writing developed in different cultures. The discovery of the letter, at a time when the first civilizations were occurring around the world, marks the end of prehistory. From the moment people invented the letter, written clues about their lives and activities became part of everyday life: receipts and bills were written, contracts were signed, significant events, laws and literary works were recorded. It was the beginning of written history.
Explanation:
- The original method of writing probably evolved from the clay marks used by traders in Mesopotamia.
- Around 3500 BC. e. The markings were stamped on the surface of the clay ball, marking the type and quantity of goods, and a few hundred years later Mesopotamians began to use sticks to leave wedge marks on moist clay tablets.
- Essential tables are sun-dried to be stored in libraries. The tags grew into a letter called cuneiform, which has been in use for almost 3300 years.
Class: History
Level: Middle school
Keywords: written sources, Mesopotamia, cuneiform, letter
Learn more on Historical sources on
brainly.com/question/238526
brainly.com/question/504287
#learnwithBrainly
When Europeans arrived in the 1500s, an estimated 5 million people were living under Aztec. They formed a mighty empire by conquering adjacent cities. And they also controlled trade in the region and demanded tribute or payment from the cities they conquered.
Berbers we’re the people of north africa
