No............... hope that helped
China is quite isolated because of surrounding mountains. Never seeing the other civilizations or hearing about them from nomads. It was difficult to travel there either way, one again because of the surrounding mountains, so no one was necessarily willing to venture out or into the area that was, at the time, China.
Bear in mind, I could be wrong. But I'm 98% positive that it is correct.
“One of the strangest controversies in the history of Orientalism turned upon the “origin of bhakti”, as if devotion had at some given moment been a new idea and thenceforth a fashionable one. It would have been simpler to observe that the word bhakti means primarily a given share, and therefore also the devotion or love that all liberality presupposes; and so that inasmuch as one “gives God his share” (bhagam), i.e. sacrifces, one is his bhakta. Thus in the hymn, “If thou givest me my share” amounts to saying “If thou lovest me”. It has often been pointed out that the Sacrifice was thought of as a commerce between Gods and men: but not often realised that by introducing into traditional conceptions of trade notions derived from our own internecine commercial transactions, we have falsified our understanding of the original sense of such a commerce, which was actually more of the potlatsh type, a competition in giving, than like our competitions in taking.
The answer is the first one
Answer:
-The telegraph helped people communicate with eachother
-The lightbulb helped light up homes and helped factory workers work longer and the telephone helped people communicate faster and easier.
