1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Virty [35]
2 years ago
6

According to some historians, which marks the beginning of the US Civil War?

History
2 answers:
snow_lady [41]2 years ago
7 0
The battle of Fort Sumter
Alex777 [14]2 years ago
5 0
"The battle of Fort Sumter" is the one among the following choices that are given in the question that <span>some historians, marks the beginning of the US Civil War. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the third option or option "C". I hope it helps you.</span>
You might be interested in
What were three ways spartans were different  from other people in greece?
ahrayia [7]
The Spartans focused more on militaristic strength than on philosophical and intellectual pursuits. They gave more respect to women than other Greek city states. Their government was less democratic than other areas of Greece.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The authors purpose is to persuade the reader that child labor is wrong which passage best supports this purpose secret garden
photoshop1234 [79]

the authors purpose is to persuade the ready

7 0
3 years ago
What was the impact and/or relationship between Jim Crow laws / Jim Crow Era and the
lina2011 [118]

Answer:

In September 1895, Booker T. Washington, the head of the Tuskegee Institute in Alabama, stepped to the podium at the Atlanta Cotton States Exposition and implored white employers to “cast down your bucket where you are” and hire African Americans who had proven their loyalty even throughout the South’s darkest hours. In return, Washington declared, southerners would be able to enjoy the fruits of a docile work force that would not agitate for full civil rights. Instead, blacks would be “In all things that are purely social . . . as separate as the fingers.”

Washington called for an accommodation to southern practices of racial segregation in the hope that blacks would be allowed a measure of economic freedom and then, eventually, social and political equality. For other prominent blacks, like W. E. B. Du Bois who had just received his PhD from Harvard, this was an unacceptable strategy since the only way they felt that blacks would be able to improve their social standing would be to assimilate and demand full citizenship rights immediately.

Regardless of which strategy one selected, it was clear that the stakes were extremely high. In the thirty years since the Civil War ended African Americans had experienced startling changes to their life opportunities. Emancipation was celebrated, of course, but that was followed by an intense debate about the terms of black freedom: who could buy or sell property, get married, own firearms, vote, set the terms of employment, receive an education, travel freely, etc. Just as quickly as real opportunities seemed to appear with the arrival of Reconstruction, when black men secured unprecedented political rights in the South, they were gone when northern armies left in 1877 and the era of Redemption began. These were the years when white Southerners returned to political and economic power, vowing to “redeem” themselves and the South they felt had been lost. Part of the logic of Redemption revolved around controlling black bodies and black social, economic, and political opportunities. Much of this control took the form of so-called Jim Crow laws—a wide-ranging set of local and state statutes that, collectively, declared that the races must be segregated.

In 1896, the year after Washington’s Atlanta Cotton Exposition speech, the Supreme Court declared in Plessy v. Ferguson that racial segregation was constitutional. It would take fifty-eight years for that decision to be reversed (in Brown v. Board of Education). In the meantime, African Americans had to negotiate the terms of their existence through political agitation, group organizing, cultural celebration, and small acts of resistance. Much of this negotiation can be seen in the history of the Great Migration, that period when blacks began to move, generally speaking, from the rural South to the urban North. In the process, African Americans changed the terms upon which they exercised their claims to citizenship and rights as citizens.

There are at least two factual aspects of the Great Migration that are important to know from the start: 1) the black migration generally occurred between 1905 and 1930 although it has no concrete beginning or end and 2) from the standpoint of sheer numbers, the Great Migration was dwarfed by a second migration in the 1940s and early 1950s, when blacks became a majority urban population for the first time in history. Despite these caveats, the Great Migration remains important in part because it marked a fundamental shift in African American consciousness. As such, the Great Migration needs to be understood as a deeply political act.

Migration was political in that it often reflected African American refusal to abide by southern social practices any longer. Opportunities for southern blacks to vote or hold office essentially disappeared with the rise of Redemption, job instability only increased in the early twentieth century, the quality of housing and education remained poor at best, and there remained the ever-looming threat of lynch law if a black person failed to abide by local social conventions. Lacking even the most basic ability to protect their own or their children’s bodies, blacks simply left.

3 0
2 years ago
Compare the positions of the Federalists and Anti-Federalists regarding the
Vinil7 [7]

Answer:

Explanation:

One point is earned for making an accurate comparison of both Federalist and Anti-federalist positions. The Federalists wanted a stronger national government and weaker state governments, while the Anti-federalists wanted a weaker national government and stronger state government.

4 0
3 years ago
How do you start a campain for school president?
anzhelika [568]

Answer: this is advice because I’m assuming that your school president:p

first you can ask your School principal. And if you get the permission to throw a campaign then get a bunch of friends together to plan it out. When you have a whole plan down go check in with the school principal and make sure that your plan is perfectly fine and nothing is wrong with it and is allowed to be able to be inside the school. Or if you want you could possibly Or if you want you want you can have the campaign at another school. This is just friendly advice you don’t have to take it!

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Early french traders in oklahoma territory shipped their goods down the _ river to the southern port of new orleans​
    6·2 answers
  • What steps had been taken by govt to make the local government more powerful
    15·1 answer
  • Which option best completes the diagram?
    10·2 answers
  • In four to five sentences, explain the effect religion has had on Egypt's school system.
    5·1 answer
  • What did India have that was of such value to the English?
    7·1 answer
  • What aspects of Buddhism are part of pop culture today?
    11·1 answer
  • The cabinet in the uk government
    12·2 answers
  • The growth of cities, the corruption of government, and industrialization altered American life from the end of the Civil War th
    12·1 answer
  • What is Fascism’s view of religion?
    9·1 answer
  • What is the meaning of amoeba ??​
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!