1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Hunter-Best [27]
3 years ago
11

Why does Article I of the Constitution forbid the government from passing ex post facto laws

Law
1 answer:
Nezavi [6.7K]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The model of what a Legislator SHOULDN'T look like was taken from the founding fathers' knowledge of the abuses of the British Parliament. 

       The British Parliament used methods like passing Ex Post Facto laws, Bills of Attainder, and the "Corruption of the Blood" in treason as a means of silencing opposition. 

Explanation:

You might be interested in
What are serial murders and mass murders?
Inessa05 [86]

Answer:

A serial killer murders multiple people over a period of time, while a mass murderer kills a lot of people in a short time and at a single location.

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A county governed by a central party is best characterized as
liubo4ka [24]
A:communist hope this helps :)
6 0
3 years ago
State governments are required to:
ycow [4]

Answer:

D) collect federal taxes from citizens.​

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
6. If Marcus is caught with a small amount of marijuana but his state won't
IceJOKER [234]

Answer:

B. Decriminalization

Explanation:

He is guilty of possession but due to decriminalization in his State he won't be arrested

6 0
3 years ago
What is Katz argument?<br><br> What is the Katz v United States holding ?
gregori [183]
What is Katz argument: The Court ruled that Katz was entitled to Fourth Amendment protection for his conversations and that a physical intrusion into the area he occupied was unnecessary to bring the Amendment into play. "The Fourth Amendment protects people, not places," wrote Justice Potter Stewart for the Court.




What is the Katz v United States holding: The Court ruled that Katz was entitled to Fourth Amendment protection for his conversations and that a physical intrusion into the area he occupied was unnecessary to bring the Amendment into play. "The Fourth Amendment protects people, not places," wrote Justice Potter Stewart for the Court.
3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Select the correct answer.
    14·1 answer
  • Those who opposed the constitution feared the national government would
    6·1 answer
  • If a mod warns you for no reason is there a possible was to contact some one who can over turn it?
    5·1 answer
  • . From the following sources of law within our legal system, list them in the order of most binding to least binding (assume all
    7·1 answer
  • Ayudenme por fis
    15·1 answer
  • Explain any TWO (2) principles of bureaucracy<br>according to Max Weber.​
    12·1 answer
  • Why did proving American Indian heritage become important?<br> Select all that apply
    9·1 answer
  • what to do if the mother left y'all baby with you and she has a family protection order on you In the person bring the baby you
    5·1 answer
  • Citizenship as a right that is materialised through active participation
    14·1 answer
  • By what year were there laws against abortion in practically every state in the u. S. ?.
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!