The correct answer to this
question is when:
<span>
“d. we have begun to think for ourselves about
moral questions”</span>
<span>Based on the Socratic view
of morality by Frankena, morality is ingrained in all of us. We must not let
our choices be determined by our emotions, rather inspect the moral question
and go after the best reasoning. The only question we need to answer is whether
the action is right or wrong, and not what will occur to use, what others will feel
of us, nor how we feel about what happened. </span>
Answer: A. High- High
Explanation: Ethical dissonance as such arises due to inconsistencies in attaining and maintaining a moral image of oneself and being tempted to exploit some unethical situation for the sake of personal gain. In other words, it is the interaction of the company / organisation and the individual with the aim of adapting the individual and the organisation in different possible situations and scenarios. It is a two-way process because the ethics of an individual influences the organisation, simply the individual enters his / her ethics. Also the ethics of the organisation influences the behaviour of the individual.
Of the four possible fit models / options, high-high is one of two fit options that have a high person-organisation fit. So this is a model that provides a fit relationship between the organisation and the individual. When an individual has a high level of ethics, and organisation too, fit with an organisation of course high. That's the case here.
There is another high fit, therefore the agreement of organisations and individuals, but this is not the case here, when a person is of low ethics. Then for that individual it is a high fit of course if it is also a low ethics organisation, such an organisation suits a low ethics individual.
The other two cases of fit are when there is a low level of fit between the organisation and the individual.
Easy bro they helped from indian attacks they knew the roads or trails better and knew how to get across rivers and streams
