Police violence should be the best answer. There are all types of marchers, marching for different things. There would only be a lack of support from other citizens if those marches weren’t agreed with by the majority, basically saying that some marches had support from others. A repeal of voting legislation is definitely not the answer, as a march is not enough to strip someone’s voting rights away, no matter what time period we’re speaking of. A lack of nation television coverage could be a near answer, as some marches may be seen unimportant and therefore not being televised. But as the question directs to marchers experiences, and not a certain march, this wouldn’t be right. By using order of elimination, the only available, and reasonable answer would be police violence, as many marches are seen as public disorder, and therefore treated by the law. Most of the time, these marches are made to disrupt, and polices mostly respond with brutality or brute.
Answer:
(a) They were the first constitution of the United States, and they united the newly independent states under a national government with limited power.
Explanation:
The Articles of Confederation was completely ratified in 1781 with every state agreeing to the ratification, which was the first Constitution of the United States following the American War of Independence.
However, this constitution lacks a central government or power over foreign and domestic commerce, which implies that the national government has limited power.
Hence, in this case, the correct answer is option A. They were the first constitution of the United States, and they united the newly independent states under a national government with limited power.
C. the closing of the First Bank of the United States
The correct answer is: D. They believed that representatives were better able to vote on national issues than ordinary citizens were.
Explanation
The excerpt contrasts ancient democracies, that were characterized by tyranny and run by mobs, to the idea of a large government representation so as to demostrate that whenevever a group of people is assembled, no matter who is in it, they tend to make the wrong decisions, that is, decisions led by passion instead of reason as stated in the excerpt:
"<em>passion never fails to wrest the sceptre from reason".</em>
Moreover, Federalists wanted a strong national government, instead of granting the power to the states, and believed that only one person could represent 30.000 people.
Because Wilson could not get enough support from senate.
