1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
VladimirAG [237]
3 years ago
5

John Locke had the power to govern comes from the permission of the people. The purpose of government is to protect the natural

rights of its citizens. If the government does not protect these rights, the citizens have the right to overthrow the government.
History
2 answers:
Dominik [7]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

True

Explanation:

John Locke is one of the most influential political philosopher in the ancient history between 1632 and 1704 . He believed that since the people give the power to the government, they have the right to take it away if the government is not serving the purposes for which it was established.

xeze [42]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Yes

Explanation:

The purpose of the government is to govern the citizens in a way that is constitutional. In other words, the government, through its leadership has to given the electorate in a way that is transparent and acceptable. This means sunning all the forms of monopolism, dictatorship, mass killings, unfair trials, and breach of the law. In the event that the leadership violates the fundamental principles of these values, the citizens have the right to remove the government. Some do it through impeachment, some through the most violent methods like a civil war. In this case, the people express their dissatisfaction with the current government.  

You might be interested in
Could the united states between 1870 and 1914 be considered a land opportunity?
Butoxors [25]
I would say yes, there were new job opportunities, lots of unclaimed land, and people could escape intolerance. 
4 0
3 years ago
What is the difference between hate speech and incitement to genocide??
Sveta_85 [38]
<span>"What is the difference between hate speech and direct and public incitement to commit genocide? The Rwanda Media Case emphasized that incitement to commit genocide required a calling on the audience (be they listeners or readers) to take action of some kind. Absent such a call, inflammatory language may qualify as hate speech but does not constitute incitement. In many jurisdictions hate speech itself has been criminalized."
-</span><span>Encyclopedia</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Please help! im stuck on this.
stiv31 [10]

Answer: A

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Someone please help ASAP will give brainliest an extra points
Wewaii [24]
The first one I would believe
4 0
3 years ago
After the losses in greece why did the persians grow unhappy with the government
IrinaVladis [17]
Actually most were happy to leave the swamp of trying to force peace onto the ever warring greeks
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following belongs in this list of conditions created by the Articles of Confederation to admit a territory into the
    8·1 answer
  • What does caravan mean on the Silk Road
    7·1 answer
  • What was the Atlantic Charter?
    12·2 answers
  • Which statement best describes the values behind entitlement programs?
    13·2 answers
  • For what did the Populist movement stand?
    9·2 answers
  • Which statement BEST describes the philosophy of Sir Robert Filmer? A. Kings derive their power from the consent of their subjec
    12·2 answers
  • Why were blacks denied the chance to be in combat during the early part of the Civil War?
    9·1 answer
  • How were Samuel Adams and Thomas Jefferson alike in their position of ratifying the constitution
    10·2 answers
  • How did Hindu animal sacrifices impact Buddhist practices?​
    8·2 answers
  • Which of the following is not a major motivation behind the rise of American Imperialism?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!