The right to petition members of the government is contained in the First Amendment to the constitution.
Answer:
Governments can be run and managed well or poorly based on leaders in charge- look at explanation
Explanation:
A government can usually dictate to some degree what people do. So if the government passes a law that bans a certain race or gender from doing a certain thing, whether it be applying for a job, or eating at a certain restaurant, then the government is limiting human rights. This, morally to us as a modern society as seen as a bad thing because it judges people based on things they cannot change, instead of things people can change like attitude or character. Now lets say a government decided to pass a law that provided healthcare or education for its people. This would be a good thing because people who become educated or maintain their health will most likely be beneficial to the society that they are a part of.
Answer: it is not: it places an emphasis on stoicism
Explanation:
It would be "(2) creating the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO)" that best illustrates the Cold War policy <span>of containment, since this organization represented a western "block" of countries that was meant to act as a counterbalance to the eastern "block" of communist countries. </span>
This violated the separation of powers idea
The separation of powers was that power should be separated between various people or institutions in order to ensure that the government is fair. If the King controls the courts then the courts just act according to the King's will, even if the King does something that is illegal which means that the King is a tyrant and an absolutist.
