I hope this answers your question..
The majority of the Court, according to Justice William Brennan, agreed with Johnson and held that flag burning constitutes a form of "symbolic speech" that is protected by the First Amendment. The majority noted that freedom of speech protects actions that society may find very offensive, but society's outrage alone is not justification for suppressing free speech.
In particular, the majority noted that the Texas law discriminated upon viewpoint, i.e., although the law punished actions, such as flag burning, that might arouse anger in others, it specifically exempted from prosecution actions that were respectful of venerated objects, e.g., burning and burying a worn-out flag. The majority said that the government could not discriminate in this manner based solely upon viewpoint.
Answer:
throughout
option B is correct answer of this question
hope it helps
Answer:
William Dawes was a tanner and a patriot who lived in Boston, Massachusetts during the American Revolution. William Dawes was one of the riders sent by Dr. Joseph Warren to alert John Hancock and Samuel Adams of the approaching British army on the night of April 18, 1775.
Explanation:
hope this helps uwu :))
Answer:
1. Freedom
2. Because the will have their own rights, because Americas a free country
3. They might feel bad, leaving everything they knew, but some might say its okay, because they just want to be free.
